From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F15721F778 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 00:51:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oiao187 with SMTP id o187so22785159oia.2 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 00:51:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9+4X76XHbkBZU6Usuqgfg1L2SKL0+u+ZvMyvgURx5Xk=; b=uPFw0/5rxKYurymwQimtEwjrchjJ1QdQOz89LKvDuAV0u9Kf1WqSGct2P1q14aRQG0 H5yQrVdK9CTD/d1OiTXJc+WZqAzbYJHp4o/8QkCDfIfJnCpsuvJRzBICMvF/Sg1dRKUV GI/bDGIxzjln0kZlO7KjYxgDQk6JCbmNm76I8t4TISa8J2tHRUM12KD1y/zIa8DFEeOs M5FDEem9luFrghEmy11FWFj7eoM/2g+i1mvXEpOLwOqbeD5G2pHviNlrdZ6AIQDi2T35 +YgjcW0pWJ8mgYlmUQg6HRGqh4I61TVJFj4mlMvp7Cxq5EOnpjJI2EuWWuaCZQ4DVfpu GHvg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.11.72 with SMTP id 69mr14385627oil.110.1444636309735; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 00:51:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.108.212 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 00:51:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:51:49 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Loganaden Velvindron Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] Help with the AQM layer X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 07:52:15 -0000 I passed a partial patch around yestereday that almost but not quite added support for the rtt parameter. On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm reading about this on the website: > > " > The AQM layer has no configuration options. However, it is planned to add > simple tuning options for different prevailing RTTs that may be > significantly different from the Internet-scale 100ms currently assumed. > Satellite links tend to impose longer RTTs, and enclosed LANs tend to hav= e > much shorter RTTs. > " > > In Mauritius, and other african countries, we have RTT of around 300-400 = ms. > Could someone please point me to where I should look for adding a tunable > for this in the source files ? > > > Kind regards, > //Logan > C-x-C-c > > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Do you want faster, better, wifi? https://www.patreon.com/dtaht