From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22d.google.com (mail-ob0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC0E921F1E7 for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 12:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbkp3 with SMTP id kp3so93374575obb.3 for ; Tue, 05 May 2015 12:56:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9FDxdsoa7J1FtwDUq7Y8ZeArPjKlNzNW0c5rMFICJMc=; b=GcZBrec2a4oLfXYvDXfMLsuC7FvjPsn1KCHy7SVMQlnpCYMK7/L+S2tinp5a4VZo8l 9IU0fSrWoX6/VFpgxZmM5ZUGT8WHcXdq0l7+dNAaJ/IbwlZh0PvN4j2g2uuBB0TpjP20 JZrdTq4t1FsD5KJiiJUek2uE2bT4AxYnidEv5UlZR75rjkx85h/2uzhZIYeQio0LLpBA MLDYn+NGw4D5Vw1WydN70HVngpNX22vx4bu9oE0MRuEMfQioaZ3BorwSnPNeSihlm9OQ TDH9uk6XoGqUhrlJ3sp3M4Yq2tdV9G4uZhSvaOuCeL0VhiqIQrAh5aXUjCFIHvfRc3Xq 7Ejg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.223.131 with SMTP id w125mr22689170oig.108.1430855782300; Tue, 05 May 2015 12:56:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.71.139 with HTTP; Tue, 5 May 2015 12:56:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 12:56:22 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] testing cake at 55mbit down/5mbit up X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 19:57:08 -0000 The behavior is repeatable. I guess I will have to do a detailed exploratio= n of the captures. Perhaps this kernel or the one on the remote server has is= sues. Linux lakshmi 3.16.0-31-lowlatency #43-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Tue Mar 10 17:56:21 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/prio_cake/ > > I did have one massively anomalous result, on the 6vs4compete test, > where it had a crazy high number of drops. > > The rest looked pretty sane although the diffserv4 thing did not line > up with the markings netperf-wrapper is using for the rrul test. > > qdisc cake 801f: root refcnt 2 bandwidth 5Mbit diffserv4 flows > Sent 40103696 bytes 150518 pkt (dropped 11579, overlimits 449993 requeue= s 0) > backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 > Class 0 Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 > rate 5Mbit 4687Kbit 3750Kbit 1250Kbit > target 5.0ms 5.0ms 5.0ms 14.5ms > interval 105.0ms 105.0ms 105.0ms 116.3ms > Pk delay 52.7ms 7.5ms 1.9ms 1.1ms > Av delay 21.5ms 4.5ms 118us 39us > Sp delay 2.3ms 1us 108us 20us > pkts 66383 95449 103 162 > way inds 0 0 0 0 > way miss 5 39 103 5 > way cols 0 0 0 0 > bytes 9484277 31571621 11481 10311 > drops 11572 7 0 0 > marks 2429 745 0 0 > qdisc ingress ffff: parent ffff:fff1 ---------------- > Sent 406045781 bytes 293044 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) > backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 > > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67