From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A9D33B2A4 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2017 11:28:40 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id j137so26099261qke.10 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2017 08:28:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Vvmjp84Nc3yzo8RtLK/Owg5Q8K/mkRCdS0pqEu+RHtY=; b=rsvjbYUzrr5WyrGYwmSleDoqAm/y+JRAsgM8EfV7b/rqdZL2dRvx1Zd0PKk9wq0YHu wumiLxKyNy+2jaYgs/0Y9DvmdzhIcDtt7AKMRE0vLAd8hJi8octs83BB4HHslNCi8tiN b8jSrVeHG26Xy+M5aL78SbfMpGkbNzOLU9pPq4O5wL4glpr8aBAVzdTAH3YTTIzsvoL6 r36fZB0jXn/QJ47i95CzEqguwtKHxwtz3qsCTdlnyTwtGxekLia2Fo0w2s6xGGzjnap0 ym38YVd450a8lG41gje/IX6F+6zfcIMQ2ZL0uiZgdwCu/zB6KRHEgbOph7OrWEdwuS1W RwoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Vvmjp84Nc3yzo8RtLK/Owg5Q8K/mkRCdS0pqEu+RHtY=; b=aG9VREFcaMj1J70TNCxJQCWdQX3OCBeTQdw0u0rooctHggM4ymnHJKmfjZtoAorsqg 8DpjMq5+W7TuqpCICOTns+uM99U+hXwZcgmJz2SZBUxew5hqB9NnDe6T7g6kTZbs14dr 3EjhD0OjD7+tJwBzTqyEsz9CRQK+qKaqA3MqbnG3OM/7gpX6t6B7cTsRG1CUGHkKRPP2 GADjqTly2zILOYJFHlxi7Rd3bH1RpLEjo7GgNnXL76pK8YByfiQUMo+D3rGWARhlOE+g Fo1n1z6cTZgIuDzLHNniUXS03PssZmDCP00uEZUzXnUQVjYag7JSworPxHKewB3VeDFL 1V2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKGkykiaiPKYIO4dLtvXhT+i1Fjv1UAaovZaQ1dDsCpBxEsEq5H tRnCqeoAAuoR10hwMyQPBLznrTYO/qBx4Qgtbm8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBos12tHPyYMpiemoSdiu1e7fTHPFDoIeWosJ3dWO5HCelooyU4ShVvo0MVyvHdtTyVON18OWZRwDQFYt/Ysc5z4= X-Received: by 10.55.188.6 with SMTP id m6mr34503143qkf.75.1514305720224; Tue, 26 Dec 2017 08:28:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.193.93 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Dec 2017 08:28:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20171226150816.27668-1-toke@toke.dk> References: <20171226150816.27668-1-toke@toke.dk> From: Dave Taht Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 08:28:39 -0800 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: Cake List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Cake] [PATCH] Split tin stats to its own structure to decrease size of tc_cake_xstats X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 16:28:40 -0000 The puzzling thing about the reported error for this function is that the static analysis checker is complaining about 1400+ bytes being used *on the stack* (in gnet_stats_copy-app?) for the pa-risc architecture, and that arch, only, which I just don't "get". That said, this patch will end up copying less data most of the time, and fool the static analysis checker in that case.