From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 958DA21F9EE for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oigb199 with SMTP id b199so94876489oig.3 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:19:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1km1jh+KCmW+8Z3cBXdHojwGOz0zh5OlOysRO/6eqTY=; b=X56Zet9Zmx4mHRT/h7QyAn6XVuOGldKzkaENxqTsM5y/RE3wGIfGI9rTLL/ovRBK03 pxiAJauApfXIkzasCYhn2Zi5KOB6W7s1TDD8pXdsMd9MVstHmi8bbKAIvXxJ4Z3uenuZ TTCAOwXaCPhrz497eaBUz4y5rExSL/2JBF6dwGm9s2yADisxI2Hu5mNg+6tLQYoVHJBH Apc7+sAR2GGDasCXXUPtVEMZqYgPmCOqNq5LEnEySks2VpCw2tDaJp0gr1SsMx+EPsCh eaZuXoQmGJ9G0KVmpLpVi4gWrlSBh42GEZjICRdIhxaxWdbg2K6UOo4Gcj3EcqAefhZv DnVA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.240.135 with SMTP id wa7mr4433948obc.63.1435429163516; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:19:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.105.129 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:19:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:19:23 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cake] cake notes X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 18:19:52 -0000 I think exposing an "interval" param (at least) is needed for those that want to try cake on satellite links. still want squashing and ultimately diffserv intercon. need testing with drr + cake and some filters (sort of an isp environment) - I do not know if drr works right with stuff that can drop packets. the new flow hashing apis continue to settle upstream in 4.X with no actual users in the code. I have been misusing the bandwidth parameter to put a cap on memory use on = wifi. a stat shown on active flows would be good. There was some other stat I wanted... and getting more users to get more feedback would be good. --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast