From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-il1-x12f.google.com (mail-il1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F5013B29D for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 01:33:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-il1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id l6so1498787ilo.2 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 22:33:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iqY+ZN8T+mw7uUP4+yOpunaUlVqYCliwzEkFs4Gj2J0=; b=LmAGpfXecxKhTd7qFN9t6pPhMRd3LZT/GTTmd09KGXKzkS/jEURozSpjrRk1OiIUmj TUuftuyHEOJYjKUwC/plY+QNERgnOMNB6N2ZiMclflXH1Ze2/XuBJwNEq2HBJgyNxr+x 9TfFXzmTI/R7nLUnVmLvwKd6b/DEx1IimefFtiNpst4ejM0u5K4IuiIX+MUf6x6citQB w69ws6YwVY+JTmCbiekXkcmIydgBKE+LvKyoWC49pEx4c2fuQHsHJEU6JmfC18oalgtR AMB7Yi0jQIEnd63fW+BwCttS0YbHurc2oFDydgcqrY1xNlhxZnhVZgR9jUEMAxIwe4nv 9p6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iqY+ZN8T+mw7uUP4+yOpunaUlVqYCliwzEkFs4Gj2J0=; b=BqizDtD39FodtV/BOKpLwf+LzwMIyaxyZxZD3APqgnZZF54tW4zj8/EApqCv50189S SE3N7zBsEBB1fH6sU7QpkfWXqbgtH0Oe30wwJoGKcnRL7mA/1aqQ0JdeHZIAVAN4U4gZ IYrtz36DnHesW7/HGipP1yneQbru2IxXUjWppAqegazH5yod8RDX5zYktFsosJNQ953B i/FO/DcfGy38dcdhAeEbx6gCBM/YHO1hTtdVJVc+zdpNGtVIhrKjW3QmLlw2HOC2mSuO mJnhwbxBUikmykrLgbCNyYK3dFZtinyqvE5FI2HEy8GrO5/Kr9BGHuAcOI68hS+UvzVC 2WOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532LFM5V50sbdfNkap7130+5sWpCfiCzEhdix4tJQbirNG56sLSv scG9v8LdFi3HB90QUaueeaxQ6SU4HEYwCCpcyyk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTxrn1TXKkE6YOMt1JXqiWTB54s9irIBGtH8ZGm2HvRY22MmTAlddUw6CQFb6gk55zkVbndony/rqYIje088Q= X-Received: by 2002:a92:d409:: with SMTP id q9mr1441116ilm.246.1592285588099; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 22:33:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87wo5okhbo.fsf@toke.dk> <875zd6h3bu.fsf@toke.dk> <7FCC9B1F-7F4B-43E8-B557-88B2A845C28B@gmail.com> <48938727-0CFF-4B72-B82B-49E0535E9B82@gmail.com> <87y2pgi5ue.fsf@toke.dk> <1F6D30F9-A697-4588-9AB7-2A3757924900@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Dave Taht Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 22:32:56 -0700 Message-ID: To: Avakash bhat Cc: Jonathan Morton , =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= , Cake List , Vybhav Pai , Shrinidhi Varna , "Mohit P. Tahiliani" , Deepak K Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Cake] Query on ACK X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 05:33:08 -0000 I have an idea for a good paper that compares set associative vs non-set associative hashing in an interesting way that nobody has done yet. I'd rather not publish the idea here, but if anyone has time for writing two simulation tests and writing yet another kewl paper, please contact me offlist, thx!