From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B60DC21F1CB for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 23:46:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by oixx65 with SMTP id x65so20196550oix.0 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 23:46:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yp3EXdx06nVegK3eHN9ELXltePkXhC6t9zAqzZDbtIY=; b=pddNWHBCLDY2TTF2rAybiKTsElTtENOAp9PDkQhDU+pn07N8NywYLSBcfhc1MEO3j9 7OFReeuEGPWwFNlrso9yivduZqpU/zKs/QG+j8Kcz/9E+vGafoYncxpjx4E1Pw6Zhr9p Vg2MnR6SYiYvANSMmI52DL4UnmOFRet46XD6xD+q8f4EyzYLTrv5P0DrZRq03fhwZMsx 6NlFHBfiRUoRKJKFt94OEJabWk2iLJuh9STCBp21uu426XcTWYHNu83yJG31PsVJcc0x fLSOeLovAWz1SYAKLF0LpMteDkgEIexxzQ1bXjqGBU6ubLajYAXfGFMQj036V9hZ7759 mVbQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.64.198 with SMTP id n189mr27044oia.139.1447832793325; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 23:46:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.50.130 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 23:46:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:46:33 +0100 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cake] cake shaper vs leaky bucket algorithm X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:46:56 -0000 Greg white (of cablelabs) asked that how cake's shaper works, be compared to a classic leaky bucket algorithm... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaky_bucket Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! https://www.gofundme.com/savewifi