From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net,
"codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] [Codel] Control theory and congestion control
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 10:58:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5SZ4W1Y919HZ1-FEqhZZMxZzJJg_6wSQw+R_owpF27oQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5D9E2jPDcuChvAqhLajHgesNucBS4Xn6dSQERmLkOb7g@mail.gmail.com>
This was that patch against the https://github.com/dtaht/sch_cake repo.
http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/cake_reduced_target/0001-sch_cake-add-experimental-decreasing-target-at-100-p.patch
(I am not seriously proposing this for anything... but I am loving
having cake be out of the main linux tree. I can have a new idea, make
a change to the algo, compile, test in a matter of seconds, and/or run
a comprehensive netperf-wrapper suite over a cup of coffee, and then
try something else)...
there is something of a backlog of new ideas on the cake mailing list
and elsewhere.
I guess I should track the random ideas in branches in the github repo.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-10 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-09 19:02 [Cake] " Jonathan Morton
2015-05-10 3:35 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-10 6:55 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-05-10 17:00 ` [Cake] [Codel] " Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-10 14:46 ` [Cake] " Jonathan Morton
2015-05-10 17:04 ` [Cake] [Codel] " Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-10 17:48 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-10 17:58 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2015-05-10 18:25 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-10 16:48 ` [Cake] " Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-10 18:32 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-05-11 7:36 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-11 11:34 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-05-11 13:54 ` [Cake] Explicit Load Regulation - was: " Jonathan Morton
2015-05-12 23:23 ` [Cake] " David Lang
2015-05-13 2:51 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-05-13 3:12 ` David Lang
2015-05-13 3:53 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw5SZ4W1Y919HZ1-FEqhZZMxZzJJg_6wSQw+R_owpF27oQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox