From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com (mail-qt0-x22c.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9AEA3BA8E
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon,  2 Jul 2018 16:07:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id l10-v6so14893447qtj.0
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 13:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=2NbUsviwH82xuQWt9MPR6iCAgwWIAnJhQnhxgQszUx4=;
 b=IyJyjZjFuu3odZ8YABFu/jGGkcMLP51/sk9UFKtzlnE3VnSiwkeTBABfThGkjtQJVp
 IlsQTfp0FzDrLx9NQUzm25rLMYfQzMlqIhEEVnXH52BZWDSZaYHnulw5LvTu+pmzkoM5
 1QURmEea0t4SPODH4MoQfa9c4WYrexjhDpzcd9W/x8sI6KUg+qXSgwy1gt6deleq8JR2
 EJPFH9d51pPLLslgWvOMXOU4INnj/ac4VsDHTjdius07HoSK3Jstf2OaCwjOxaJpYDsB
 pbVNyEaYc9q7z0EUX/3pUqIL6GwbFQDja37IwxH69yxVyXDhdpVOpp98Qp94kqQns1QS
 pMkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=2NbUsviwH82xuQWt9MPR6iCAgwWIAnJhQnhxgQszUx4=;
 b=eFn8hvmBVeotmUr+f0w73dPVHMfF/YAyG+Ge8LSnWRXxoLMIPWc1q259/B4AHMGuCA
 rf54hDZSdB9Q97dG5fDhzJglS5zlGzSuUgFUlJ4sYGP/UjXmad7Hrj9iX2zwo664Psyt
 XZkiXvV/eeTj0XUEJXqSRjAmIHocac4uS5qaLfcLgcGfLk7rmQbluwbdq77f+/zQNWUn
 WkuNAqYwaao+qyJDmGxsbfSCXT/N+VFmGahAngXkAU3EtwGjTlnd16NxaH1rrDVtrycS
 jh8UrYAr9dLlOKStZmb9EnzsM7JxvdPC+RKzTzc+AFSL+F0HdTmV07s/zRyGK0k7nb9F
 ca7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2iuQlkrW5JVz77RYLdyHLoFA3WGIpZheLYwyG0AEyBP6/4VVsx
 2lOrxG3bWMZyOAjYXHJguujfsYPlt3XyLWJByOh2Hg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpd257KLeQtJHqsa2HubYUa6jWglCpC3CLgldHc86WnmM9QDFfTLrTOqYFzhln/5VeKbs6bp8qWl+jrNSOoiKFM=
X-Received: by 2002:aed:3c8c:: with SMTP id
 d12-v6mr13911097qtf.203.1530562023152; 
 Mon, 02 Jul 2018 13:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 13:06:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5UsVnknt0_Rp3Br3QDKbBWRLkDhKNbCO4-ukUQJmpV8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Cake] l4s thoughts
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 20:07:03 -0000

whenever I get some time (and the right tcp patches) is fiddle with
two l4s approaches in fq_codel. The easy one is to leverage
ce_threshold,
accepting 1ms of queuing delay.

A better one, I think is to leverage the sparse flows optimization in
fq_codel to always mark when it's an old flow, and never mark when
it's new. That appears to be the most scalable, down to us or less.

Both ideas would take some work to do in cake, and I lack time and the
dctcp patches to try it.

--=20

Dave T=C3=A4ht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619