From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBF6B21F316 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 01:17:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by obbnk6 with SMTP id nk6so55222937obb.2 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 01:17:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=g0izQ3h3F0hBWj+Sby+T/0qeqtz8w8YOx8AM4oMs35M=; b=WVi07lW8ZafygC142TqAGmYEObi5F4OO1CfSryAINvObLoERPQz57tcHNGonYeuURV sGp6WudO7sHdcs1U8Ll/5TpEYVPFGH6GuS7izSOWcGgCu8Y5yNvP5rruWGYhiLZ8Mhh+ fQ6qw5/WQGRGPIX04EA+LCOTG8NZat+3T4tykEu96rGg7HLxBlvaQlkbSfG3jtCIcPGN JXclEhnNH3NxxdFTw7gRasWEdpSTJpfPbj2N18F9MWGh51oiATd5u7DZ7IeaFCPCbg9D P0sWW3SYe6RUzV/7AIKtCYRv2zK8RoPD2Zk/b63E0R8kVFNz/WILsTWVZza+8uVkqJYF xHAA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.81.5 with SMTP id v5mr4335607obx.78.1447924640470; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 01:17:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.50.130 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 01:17:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:17:20 +0100 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cake] cake vs fq_codel X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 09:17:44 -0000 A couple questions worth answering in a faq: A) Under what circumstances is cake a replacement for fq_codel? B) When is fq_codel a better choice than cake? Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! https://www.gofundme.com/savewifi