From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A5753BA8E for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:21:09 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id a194so21541514qkc.9 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:21:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7yupunpwY6k8tQSgJcyU2/pWSUmrW9NicCA3ZBs9oGo=; b=i4nFzaEMP2qZ5xJLDbuIGZlSV+q6IisYcwRaAwyVQZiRGuZDPo2iwJrULWQls6yY7s SetMpw4xVDDfg6qHye4N7PCPMvoWCADRT6uzjm2FrgILS6Yu6qxiwrxyp0K6Z/6HHed/ 6QU1CzP0po8zLaRhOXDLCCHRz38CdXLv0LeOND50Ab8hnYzfZCWD+SYPZ59tqNofGcyU Wz6Gpr3MF1zTr87Nkd06PoRunCuh7fAGPmQG5dGh+kDVoj1GGBcmI0esF71zXAhU2BQJ v5JaTVtP/wL+vl+y2BkHL2GwVtjgrtbASHxhDk2XPjt14Po7yVhdlmXAq7UcfS/bmupm RsrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7yupunpwY6k8tQSgJcyU2/pWSUmrW9NicCA3ZBs9oGo=; b=jCkNpCFLCkqlh/oJk/FupMSHchtJ6gaLGb3lwtJe5j695NaVm80Pe+/dzMc0VE2ayM +LA6yfg6RZPBn2y5E5yrDZ8ihZkz9EbWpGN72LEyQ56rk9CI2fGnIwIKudhuPmETDuql jcC3DRL2Abq1/7iyD79kGXEeiLHh5R3nKrxcG/Hx5pa9DY8doj6D3tqPpnSkJDs4PXNR Ag87OUpqObERNQp7HntlvBQKI4CKXOq8TnNvrRvKTyr/qh42ucIUE6l1qJ5QZgYRkOjB j7hOUw1dmjwEkeBAjEUQVMl+1JdVRdT+zBi4pSGpAV1rbsyneHUU2AXDcUrv2BKUYoKY CQUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7Ggo9iUlgNnbKVQbkse879aEfLVaYGN23TSNIDv0Dg109grRV/ Q9uLCx/xyHTeUwzajT3aW8r2M5x0Jx1Dfrxqy3w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYXRtPju/Jcv9ZU/1F/asodUg8ruVeOIAIvNpzxQHDr6Bc2fESH33NpCWf3UdT7NS11KLB08e/hLwglnC7IEq0= X-Received: by 10.55.188.6 with SMTP id m6mr1304408qkf.75.1511454068653; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:21:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.193.93 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:21:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <107CB879-B196-40F1-A7C2-08B963B7A835@gmail.com> <65345DE4-8E75-4913-9FFF-2823BF70AB85@gmail.com> From: Dave Taht Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:21:08 -0800 Message-ID: To: Pete Heist Cc: Sebastian Moeller , Cake List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] small cake_hash optimization? X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 16:21:09 -0000 On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Pete Heist wrote: > >> On Nov 23, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Pete Heist wrote: >> >> Thanks for the overhead info. I used that in my latest tests. That makes= me wonder if those overheads could be defaulted when Cake knows Ethernet i= s being used with rate limiting? I know a goal is to make cake easier to co= nfigure so such things are examples of what people are likely to miss. > > BTW I realize there=E2=80=99s no way cake can know what the overheads sho= uld actually be, just to make sure the defaults are sensible I guess. I kno= w overheads are not an easy thing. I note that the man page needs love. > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-669-226-2619