From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Cake] Fwd: [PATCH net-next 0/4] TC: refactor act_mirred packets re-injection
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 06:12:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5rPAN=kv3Ai4dzcKuZBJjQsG3qJY7YTwuag4WHo2bjQA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1531941678.git.pabeni@redhat.com>
It looks like backporting this to openwrt would be a pita, but a
potential 10% improvement to inbound shaping is not to be sneezed at
(and I imagine it could be better than that for non-intel
cache-crippled routers)
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:04 AM
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/4] TC: refactor act_mirred packets re-injection
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>, Cong Wang
<xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Daniel
Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
<marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>, Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@gmail.com>
This series is aimed at improving the act_mirred redirect performances.
Such action is used by OVS to represent TC S/W flows, and it's current largest
bottle-neck is the need for a skb_clone() for each packet.
The first 2 patches introduce some cleanup and safeguards to allow extending
tca_result: we will use it to store RCU protected redirect information.
Then a new tca_action value is introduced: TC_ACT_MIRRED, similar to
TC_ACT_REDIRECT, but preserving the mirred semantic. The last patch exploits
the introduced infrastructure in the act_mirred action, to avoid a skb_clone,
when possible.
Overall this the above gives a ~10% performance improvement in forwarding tput,
when using the TC S/W datapath.
v1 -> v2:
- preserve the rcu lock in act_bpf
- add and use a new action value to reinject the packets, preserving the mirred
semantic
Paolo Abeni (4):
tc/act: user space can't use TC_ACT_REDIRECT directly
tc/act: remove unneeded RCU lock in action callback
net/tc: introduce TC_ACT_MIRRED.
act_mirred: use ACT_MIRRED when possible
include/net/act_api.h | 2 +-
include/net/sch_generic.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h | 2 ++
net/core/dev.c | 4 ++++
net/sched/act_api.c | 7 +++++++
net/sched/act_csum.c | 12 +++---------
net/sched/act_ife.c | 5 +----
net/sched/act_mirred.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
net/sched/act_sample.c | 4 +---
net/sched/act_skbedit.c | 10 +++-------
net/sched/act_skbmod.c | 21 +++++++++------------
net/sched/act_tunnel_key.c | 6 +-----
net/sched/act_vlan.c | 19 +++++++------------
13 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
--
Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619
parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-19 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <cover.1531941678.git.pabeni@redhat.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAA93jw5rPAN=kv3Ai4dzcKuZBJjQsG3qJY7YTwuag4WHo2bjQA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox