From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0DE821FA04 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 03:34:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oiak8 with SMTP id k8so6945911oia.1 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 03:34:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P7o4W4tt0V4K89qCuHLmUuvw9r1Rj6JCURU4eVhwn20=; b=YwNoKD6tsOU9LZWXdMrgUHioRaR61LvSvxqV4KikcDSxmk9Zmz04LxXj2BIwdlomuq TjxvqAESLXPM8IllMzrUVuTuNtTvA9i69X8N274Jwp0GNco8XGT9CQeMmHe+7ZYBb2Rh uMAMuUuFdXkLYDClFjNztgPVicxc6eqxU+pJG606bC7nt/YXaO3QtOoW+aEjtpxGxTDD Q6ZVR5ISaeZYScjNODcSvHP4iobsACXNVBKUaukV61AHoln1cnSW6kiPhmCJAQp/qXFR FY3AGdoU8aQChm9/QO6EGdocVap5R19AhjdkxNIUp3/sua7t9F+kFKmJnfXQ2pqBAAGM p4+Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.11.72 with SMTP id 69mr17877902oil.110.1444732475738; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 03:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.108.212 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 03:34:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <561CDB4E.4000000@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> References: <561CDB4E.4000000@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:34:35 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake parameter anomaly? X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:35:00 -0000 active_flows was a parameter that was in one version or another that was exposed to the API. It was very useful and interesting. On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > Hi List, > > In pkt_sched.h we see an enumeration for 'TCA_CAKE_ACTIVE_FLOWS': > > /* CAKE */ > enum { > TCA_CAKE_UNSPEC, > TCA_CAKE_BASE_RATE, > TCA_CAKE_DIFFSERV_MODE, > TCA_CAKE_ATM, > TCA_CAKE_FLOW_MODE, > TCA_CAKE_OVERHEAD, > TCA_CAKE_ACTIVE_FLOWS, > TCA_CAKE_RTT, > TCA_CAKE_TARGET, > __TCA_CAKE_MAX > }; > #define TCA_CAKE_MAX (__TCA_CAKE_MAX - 1) > > These enumerations are normally used for passing options from tc into > the cake module, but at the present time, nowhere in either cake or tc > can I see use of 'ACTIVE_FLOWS'. It's not read as an input into cake, > nor is it sent out of cake back to tc via the nla_policy. > > Is this a 'typo' from when bulk/sparse flows reporting was put into the > stats, or is it some as yet unimplemented feature? > > I've meant to ask about this before but it sort of got lost. > > Kevin > > > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Do you want faster, better, wifi? https://www.patreon.com/dtaht