From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com (mail-qt0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1E573B29E for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id b15-v6so31826502qtp.11 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 21:00:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CBeOPu1mD1a4rlQo7oenCpNJuEiCabFZn5Z82MUTBGc=; b=Cx3Tw5XyeMsyG9qG32YVhnGk4Qj4dC+Z/SCpW2P2IrS2t0+CQMxAZAT2JvH3tgdImO JsL8ZnNfsja0OA72n/0DytEUNq92pnfEslIsbPDNhaJX7UOTQXy7SaYl982C0bng8ulC E5EWx8FMSc89uxCsAckq/rdRXOA0o3fC7eFe2Ad/sGLgzubAjnfdPjDoDhVAzq/nlGqa j7RcjOJeT/JpiJaEWI9mlTmYfDJEG3PlWLZQckdYjmbYyVkMrhLW7rN5NFWmVXSC4aL2 tZpz1IqfMwgUVIGm1YtIj9h6taYccioLMWZyD0Vnzfj0FpdAn26lEMkLYX+KS/v/y5cI K+NA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CBeOPu1mD1a4rlQo7oenCpNJuEiCabFZn5Z82MUTBGc=; b=X2FkkHL4s92eN1QYq1McUvj00KQb92ZiyNLwIT4i0Za2i7my/dU7YmXf5XTylhqKgR G+l3gopYoKLyjtxFv0bZyQX4W5FI/5qTLqBx9C9bqXKt6tjv9ckkQO62uhn0p9Dwdq7q zVAPwtebhyQtt/OOq2qlNlG2BTGd+lRHtfebV/3UQ2KzUzozuMIIvE3x22val808BjGq Sx2xA9174mAQ44QA7/+rwICVmP0Z1Z+zxF1dk2uF8tIHwWVaYHroAaXg7Bl+O5xBFKnj xXgx2WXZrvZyU71tDNq8UUZxo69kXo6GCA9xq4G1PFIc5CIi//IUuDlp9ffJs2GBam0w Vjuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGtJ2N+K5tWet9sn5mKm59fcrcmrz+2kJ52D0YWqV19Q6SePwXY rcZ5bPfZvZwsIFnZa0xPyd4fuPHjaFPmTX4OoaA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdtzYr6Vv8xq7G60HYLful+h1e5KBnJEmi8M4gfWkGMW53/9kpnt0/QvQI8WU4ekvrObKTAg6c/7VZr+vWvDuM= X-Received: by 2002:aed:3c8c:: with SMTP id d12-v6mr13941609qtf.203.1531713630339; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 21:00:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8736wla3lq.fsf@toke.dk> <4C12C6A1-84E3-4B78-885F-F5C212CD13FF@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> <87wotw96el.fsf@toke.dk> <83B2AEF4-C052-444F-8AFA-E8C3EE2F4A7F@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> <87wotw6yeo.fsf@toke.dk> In-Reply-To: From: Dave Taht Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 21:00:19 -0700 Message-ID: To: Jonathan Morton Cc: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant , Cake List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Cake] Backporting 'tc class' support X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 04:00:30 -0000 I am curious if the new tc class support would allow for recognizing sebastian's desire to have the llc (?) dsl control packets moved to the higher priority tin? Similarly, there were other things in early-sqm (like deprioritizing ping, prioritizing dns) that I liked, but disliked using iptables to use. lastly, the hopelessly overloaded skb->priority field is hopefully still not recognized for anything that actually sets skb->priority naively?