From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 844FA3CBB0; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 16:39:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-x232.google.com with SMTP id s79so73662308oie.1; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:39:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RGEuLMfjNh3kwdUFwLCyb7UlNrXOjGkQ/cRtGYO1bqA=; b=Ade3Ol/UsZTQdJrmAGD3i+o67CMHsPfSpEEQUfhLXSLJqu/dubJyQ+PhnhKoLn+DjP BhB/R6reDAVj87VZDpOiFenzrqalnhg7ASHnFq3Dd9zl0qZkhIziQ7kfZ3Blu9ZeDyle 5bcDo8inas2dtrY9YTB+457CjQXByw2geRPzD8MqyawC/PKeFlxtNTeCqwanWYlJDfyQ fATBSlmNi176fDk3DJaZRVfDAtd4G2UF2K6qhzowRPS4I+EDADTGjAfZm6MjKtNxzsTK yxRkEAgf8JDGn8e5L3SpsHU7xaqmw5mKi7pAjKRQiyhcoUlvlTl7Lglw+YziHDn4Fc+g vT4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RGEuLMfjNh3kwdUFwLCyb7UlNrXOjGkQ/cRtGYO1bqA=; b=XgHPgV9yT/nT5LBuumLZ6cpxzKohYm0ND0RpGWAf1uC8q+eHE0K1dQvrhSTd/9glrO iYNMxDjrU6nSvpwrtFnx05iB+OF+E/t8arlxJUVeDRr5CXSL9A9YQy/tyzWxMk7u2avF 3woSusYyxn6ilDN+IjOrNzRU7tFeCjlln8a5jd5ZxzvJVZTl+5peXl6Rbh82wz03UJ+S M70PgsMlgC3G+T8aaBpZc7ooDLrrabXkWMsS6HmEHreKtOUHuENjhykDWpUl8OTM7h2G YkRAIDqfXo1Wp3WNipktFcWG0goKlqXpFJGmx511nYaTlie2QVDBnNOrbN0GX+BT70JC 0fFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJI5UP7+kIY881QKaY25Q3akuIFC7jrodJxhobRvTO4H8tcu11ER7o18ctSA4zADhx662ySRwxOOcc5FJw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.75.210 with SMTP id y201mr12183868oia.116.1459975165885; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:39:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.79.215 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:39:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2415E651-1852-4B48-A9B8-553D1A2507AE@gmail.com> <4A573483-5188-4893-82B3-721AEF527534@gmail.com> <5031EE38-920A-4B08-858A-5DC4302450AA@gmx.de> <3C097824-8754-4169-8FAB-7C802C2FB5D8@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:39:25 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: moeller0 Cc: Jonathan Morton , cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] new code point proposed X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 20:39:26 -0000 this is still not the document I read (which was better), but this is what was just discussed. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id-00 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! https://www.gofundme.com/savewifi On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > I note that somewhere along the line in the last few days I read a > very good outline of the ietf proposal to dedicate ECT(1) to a > DCTCP-like use, discussing the benefits and problems and alternate > approaches. Jonathon's ELR was mentioned, but I'll be damned if I can > find it again. It might have been part of thursdays bar bof, don't > remember. I thought it was in iccrg, wasn't. > > I have a LOT more hope for repurposing ECT(1) than diffserv markings. > > In other news (I am not at ietf) mptcp over bonded radios to an > aircraft is quite neat. > > https://buenayreb.conf.meetecho.com/q-meetecho/Index.jsp