From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x235.google.com (mail-qt0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 679B93B2A4 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 20:16:00 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qt0-x235.google.com with SMTP id u10so13796765qtg.2 for ; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 17:16:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=87QnlmDZVwz9DLNIt9/w8McM+3NaIcfmuvM7SP/JXdo=; b=NgB/kTHyWtXhsElC8+1kSgHc7MQdXvISXr5ctycgLrIWivCZYafA2coW9L/CJWgjOB RXKDdsMLWMaAbBh5JTYkQIgX4fc8UMk7RJ743rRW5/f3F8XcnMFsePSx3aqEX60ofuJq 4LGYACgJL9aTefzWeez8KISbhGx4T14txfrAUS1I1nj41egCpq7RQuywWRKA6d8iII8P G8Nd0xJwIJC9eUPZ82oSjBYbboUPoiMx2KODV4UbtZ3By8ZJDz6c5Gdw7HccEqlOMe02 CUk//7qlGPXW0P6/+HsNesD0ONLOfzOcPCxpZpQqwe6K918AEYmj7F3oEx5D17ZuJjjP Jm3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=87QnlmDZVwz9DLNIt9/w8McM+3NaIcfmuvM7SP/JXdo=; b=AkO2MCGKlj8elWcqNBpie+durxfcRoyuRBhuEL90Ve0ilIMdtwxGLS66A2NykMlQR7 ZQNHGjt3UgXnImUXafspMmwOvRaGXcXKz4UtEQIpTFDyUu/4qZ4eBAxsNszTASEluY97 a3K+iIxE2iP1j3ikUCOctfqN7hn9Sh9hodn6zuNmT4aO66v9LMt9hIMCxijqzQLpAar9 PqQmfG05nfO6lNlKYYBixdXqA6+UPYBsJsrJ3y46i2WYgK/9lNM/vm+20b7ire7vweFM Qm6PAoejMSd9XpBJw9Ut90XU4wBVgL+gRAetIRHsjoH5BzkQAHTmYgoUqneDw9HcygHd 5FAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLX7wey5MvKoa1lbEBgQsTZW9P0pAfAViQGliCi0RZRHUwEgUb1 JUrF33q8VWrTscmhTQFjQEMNFJZML38SlWcCaFU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZWVu98GdijjXRiHirV0o430Q++bi1G/p2YS3cuXM7c64b4NLFT30B31OuJ0ZcoblTj5gSB/W1SXGLZx4FZjE8= X-Received: by 10.237.55.9 with SMTP id i9mr7430062qtb.164.1512609359785; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 17:15:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.193.93 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 17:15:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1512525519.21401.11.camel@gmail.com> <1512525682.21401.13.camel@gmail.com> <87h8t3d0ox.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> From: Dave Taht Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 17:15:59 -0800 Message-ID: To: "Luis E. Garcia" Cc: Dave Taht , Cake List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] [Fwd: Re: RHODIUM - nuking blue (for testing)] X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 01:16:00 -0000 On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Luis E. Garcia wrote: > Dave, > What is the highest bandwidth that you have been able to shape with CAKE = on > the APU2? pete ran out of cpu at 900mbit in one of the early test rounds. https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake/2017-November/003032.html > > Regards, > Luis Garcia > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> >> Groovy. >> >> I guess if I had any one goal, was that I wanted to have cake to shape >> well on the APU2 at a gigabit. That's the highest end "home router" we >> have, although it would be good to get results on things like the turris >> omnia, also. >> >> I hope to start a round of profiling as to what can be optimized (out) >> this weekend. Last I looked the hashing costs dominated. >> >> Pretty sure we're good at 200Mbit there (aside from the ingress bug). >> >> It would be nice to have a test showing blue being useful. >> >> Did you get cpu stats for the below tests? >> >> Georgios Amanakis writes: >> >> > -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> > From: Georgios Amanakis >> > To: Dave Taht >> > Cc: Cake List , Jonathan Morton > > 9@gmail.com>, Pete Heist >> > Subject: Re: [Cake] RHODIUM - nuking blue (for testing) >> > Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 20:58:39 -0500 >> > >> > I just finished testing Rhodium, and I am supplementing Sunday's >> > results. >> > >> > CMTS setup: >> > server -- delay -- isp -- mbox -- client >> > >> > ISP limited at 200/10mbit. >> > Cake/HTB shaping at 180/9mbit. >> > RTT 20ms with cake's RTT set at 20ms >> > rrul_be_nflows, 32 download, 8 upload streams. >> > net.ipv4.tcp_ecn=3D2 in all nodes (linux default) >> > >> > Cake tested in all flow-isolation modes with all ack filtering options= . >> > HTB tested with codel,pie,fq,sfq,fq_codel. >> > >> > Rhodium(cakerhod) doesn't show much difference against Cobalt(cake). >> > >> > George >> > >> > On Tue, 2017-12-05 at 11:32 -0800, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> Given some of the results thus far at various RTTs, and at higher >> >> loads, like the ginormous one georgios just ran, I thought it might >> >> be >> >> useful to run a battery of tests with blue disabled. >> >> >> >> I haven't gone to the trouble of creating a formal branch - tho if I >> >> did, I'd call it rhodium, as rhodium detectors are used in nuclear >> >> reactors to measure the neutron flux level. >> >> >> >> untested-but-compiling-patch attached. I'm busy on a few other things >> >> this week, and it is looking like we'll have to replace the xstats >> >> structure with something smaller to go mainline. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Cake mailing list >> >> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net >> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Cake mailing list >> > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net >> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake >> _______________________________________________ >> Cake mailing list >> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-669-226-2619