From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com (mail-qk0-x232.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB69C21F27C
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 15:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qkhg7 with SMTP id g7so145794937qkh.2
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 15:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=LuvuG37lPloGLqWUAPpiV9K51/UUIp7HBhReHYYkpvQ=;
	b=GKkzaKstmma3OFiiqTdP0cdXyanylNFcVJt1sVjr+JbuaNbr8TgzTkJk/S82bYQh42
	ax0nrbxgAUxzx896TZenx6eKvp3807nspR9vPD5qc+g6E9vMe3M62r/6yvIXIwq+abJD
	p/RqX0+dOl1QK34XpqHq+XcNlRqUrOzQ16qYKBRk2Bsw42nXFScRJPBHZ1CUf54JBecj
	yQ5GP4H6NBSiuUww5atQvCqr1LtnX0MfproKOI3IyJWLPe438dcGS0b/OfDLiTbTt0UC
	HnmfYuuOfMR0uu9YMzs/lsGD4MzCybHRRiWRc4FyvH5XYkkZN6pPz/FeNEUpw7cHW0d5
	aDlQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.223.228 with SMTP id qx4mr10163132oec.24.1428877512370;
	Sun, 12 Apr 2015 15:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.51.66 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 15:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 15:25:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6-jbSbx1eae89sJZ0dMcYR4fJjqTHK4saLU6AoxdSJPg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Cake] udp + ecn and udp flood tests
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 22:25:42 -0000

To test how well the overload protection works, we need to drive things
to overload. The 50 flow test works pretty good that way...

but we could use to drive the ecn marking and non-ecn marking stuff
harder with isochronous udp, an udp + ECT(2) marked flows, to measure
what really happens.

the stuff in my isochronous repo could be retasked for this, as well as
iperf and/or d-itg

--=20
Dave T=C3=A4ht
Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**

https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67