Re: [Cake] COBALT implementation in ns-3 with results under different traffic scenarios

[Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>]

y'all are well on your way towards writing a paper on this topic. Need
collaborators?
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:32 AM Jendaipou Palmei
<jendaipoupalmei@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Jonathan,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> We have uploaded the plots for the 'count' variable of COBALT (with a segment size of 1500 and 1000 bytes).
>
> Link: https://github.com/Daipu/COBALT/wiki/Cobalt-Drop-Count
>
> We have not yet implemented ECN feature in COBALT, so packets are currently dropped instead of being marked.
>
> Are these the plots that you were referring to?
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Jendaipou Palmei
> Shefali Gupta
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 5:28 PM Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 30 Nov, 2018, at 1:53 pm, Jendaipou Palmei <jendaipoupalmei@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > However, we finally noticed that it was the packet size used in our simulations that was affecting the throughput. It was earlier set to 1000 bytes, and after making it 1500 bytes (including headers) we note that the throughput is not affected.
>> >
>> > We have uploaded the new graphs on the same wiki link:
>> > https://github.com/Daipu/COBALT/wiki/Light-Traffic
>> >
>> > We're not sure why packet size is affecting the throughput so largely. Is it the expected behavior?
>>
>> That particular effect is probably accidental.
>>
>> Is it possible to also show graphs of the packet marking (or dropping) rate?  That may be revealing.
>>
>>  - Jonathan Morton
>>


-- 

Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-205-9740