From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22f.google.com (mail-ob0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13FCD21F908 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 07:01:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbzf10 with SMTP id zf10so129005334obb.2 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 07:01:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v89KQ9cFplm8dU9PcYMvTAYhM5/SuD3iP5d82AuhNos=; b=NbCC3EDo+QhQw06GGVhBqab0Ey+ANWKHfx2lis0ksw80l6GZUq739l8bCC3BLM4n7P q2qFvcAS7LFckDygdWnS9BAx7QgBXiu2dHGpZ65JNYyNYEy/AWhQlXlVwwCTUWJCbeAA 90JFCcR4dACYWxlhDS8NumSw15BLw6TLw/aJRoFoibCFp7J0lHooMFA2NNzm9NxP91UN DPxyzpLhyCMyv0wYYwZeyXB9Rfe5Ygjz29tjWWVyw23noakNdRIKA50a8UleSo1RSx57 botuvkRnEfx4EkWTK5YderGkv2kibwHy7QyKKbV+GLZofXJTIYqo5x70fEpc9jU/ftoh 2F1Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.41.9 with SMTP id b9mr16921390oel.37.1444053712922; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 07:01:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.108.212 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 07:01:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0EB23696-5866-48C5-AC7E-B8570C7AA900@gmx.de> References: <0EB23696-5866-48C5-AC7E-B8570C7AA900@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:01:52 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Sebastian Moeller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] flow_hash vs host_hash X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 14:02:26 -0000 I would like the dual-flow pony in this net-next merge window please. Otherwise I am sore inclined to get what we have out there! I hope to get the api and abi changes in today or tomorrow for the bits I understand.... On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > On Oct 5, 2015, at 14:30 , Jonathan Morton wrote: > >> It's a precursor to the dual host/flow isolation, which I'm still workin= g on. > > I believe that this is the single most asked-for feature in the o= penwrt forums, people somehow want to enforce per internal-IP fairness. I a= m not sure whether all/most people actually need this, since only a few hav= e tries pure flow-isolation before declaring per-internal-SRC-IP fairness a= requirement. But once this is in (and we get cake into openwrt default bui= lds), you will have saved a considerable amount of people gray hair ;) Just= to be clear, I am a huge cake fan (despite my occasionally sceptic emails = about obscure side issues) and hope with the dual isolation cake will offer= almost everything a typical user might actually want (well, except the pon= ies) > > Best Regards > Sebastian > >> >> - Jonathan Morton >> _______________________________________________ >> Cake mailing list >> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Do you want faster, better, wifi? https://www.patreon.com/dtaht