From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D742821F633 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:50:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbgp2 with SMTP id gp2so85061910obb.2 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:50:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Hq29efPzsPnUVtKws7u6UcTYnH/17HpktsPzoorOb6c=; b=L4RkzCQ8NS9ueBBeILW1S97rz68VBlG4QWYubOLV09KUlQdlCs57RDjqjWlvKHRh8F Eev+uXLGvR0XI1hP6rgucyAoHdyT9kok+F8lo8zMz2tGRfWCLSGUUthN0SfE2BDMfq/i qkool3YpxxW7HBlfYfuIfHgvmBpOtoKX7S/+LHvYC1j056THDg+U/u8SUP1Q7tq/0i4E CJBNfbF6koLdyxDsTNAgqX+j7t7BrziiBKmvmBbX9Moxzvd3xVH7nXRr8sV39bKKqDYn b0NaEuFJiFLRP/r7SXNc5rqJ0PE6JMzpVn9Vz2/F+ad38qkDPgoxqNHT/doByJb1PDBo +0YA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.227.15 with SMTP id a15mr15419465oih.59.1434768648826; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.105.129 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:50:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <97E8CD56-7AC5-4D0D-8B29-0E8C48FF8C5C@gmail.com> References: <97E8CD56-7AC5-4D0D-8B29-0E8C48FF8C5C@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:50:48 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Jonathan Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] CS1 behavior in diffserv4 X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 02:51:18 -0000 yes, that clobbered the transmission stuff. I wlll argue that "class" is a lousy name, and misleading to see the rate so.... With the correctly marked CS1 stuff, now, torrent backed way off. root@ranger:~# watch tc -s qdisc show dev eth2 root@ranger:~# tc -s qdisc show dev eth2 qdisc cake 8014: root refcnt 9 bandwidth 10Mbit diffserv4 flows raw Sent 165054263 bytes 534623 pkt (dropped 7727, overlimits 1035673 requeues= 0) backlog 49462b 26p requeues 0 Class 0 Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 rate 10Mbit 9375Kbit 7500Kbit 2500Kbit target 5.0ms 5.0ms 5.0ms 7.3ms interval 100.0ms 100.0ms 100.0ms 102.3ms Pk delay 215.9ms 28.0ms 445us 11us Av delay 39.9ms 3.8ms 8us 0us Sp delay 2.9ms 578us 8us 0us pkts 43184 499206 3 1 way inds 323 137 0 0 way miss 1788 1338 3 1 way cols 0 0 0 0 bytes 51178018 122599036 270 46 drops 6398 1329 0 0 marks 0 0 0 0 qdisc ingress ffff: parent ffff:fff1 ---------------- Sent 1229901568 bytes 919416 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Jonathan Morton wr= ote: > >> On 20 Jun, 2015, at 05:19, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> I have to admit I thought diffserv4 put CS1 in class 3? > > No - class 0 is background, 1 is best-effort, 2 is =E2=80=9Cvideo=E2=80= =9D and 3 is =E2=80=9Cvoice=E2=80=9D. So it=E2=80=99s working just fine. > > Try making some best-effort traffic compete with it, and see how the rela= tive throughputs go. > > - Jonathan Morton --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast