From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37EF521F325 for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 10:48:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obfe9 with SMTP id e9so32398108obf.1 for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 10:47:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wOAZJdUn+z9C8gvIVEXhKTkYhYE1wOpYjRlJpzOY/i4=; b=upf8gQMaS+E+G6z+iBU8ViP3c9872sYx5FuPC6D8bsa0MRR+65MqQnyEyEAlrin3tp 1K57T+20+xYvK9ztpc47ByPorVHjKC83mAlPpjtEWu2dRpGlO2hCWVhyrEK1TBKH1yZB Y2iPaL3w7FMr1LIXIFstLN9zP5n9K9v+rJy19IhTyE8iCbNvRHAGmrlcJkc/rqWjiXFi k6XPDiVEDKAP69KDvaqw2lAdcaV3fzBQ1YNvslMUuxnQ58EuepHB7MAPI5g6G21Xv034 XS4+Zv2Ks3UnrbKN56uo9OmS4ylfd/t+zZzQcXFqiIilNCX5YZSLs2ApSzheoWi+RcGJ U0iA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.216.138 with SMTP id p132mr10667121oig.133.1432403271305; Sat, 23 May 2015 10:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.105.146 with HTTP; Sat, 23 May 2015 10:47:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 10:47:51 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] peeling at sub-1ms X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 17:48:57 -0000 another option is when we know we have lots of flows, to peel more. On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > I think I would be happier if we peeled at 250usec rather than 1ms. At > 110Mbit that is 2 packets, but at a gig quite a lot. > > (selfishly, that is the speed I am running at while watching > dslreports misbehave) > > The second problem is that the default peeling behavior somehow should > work while at line rate, whether the rate be 10mbit or a gbit. > > I am going to go try the former, now.... > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67