From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: moeller0 <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>,
Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] second system syndrome
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 11:40:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6NN2vWRjuB46eL69_tQqhBvLAvA8nAeH0TyYhiU1TsyQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B1BE65C1-480C-4122-A877-5A0C7445C705@gmx.de>
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:02 AM, moeller0 <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
> I had a quick look over these, both htb+fq_codel egress and bcake egress (both without perf) seem “contaminated" by a periodic process with a period of 50/8 = 6.25 seconds. Is this one of the cyclic probes measuring cpu load or so?
> BTW are you using simplest.qos or simple.qos for the htb+fq_codel test (or something unrelated to sqm)? I ask because we have a shipload of costly iptables/tc filter stuff only happening in simple.qos (while rural_be will not use any DSCPs besides 0 the filters should still cost a bit CPU). I do not seem to be able to see any additional meta information from the flent files, probably PEBCAK n my side...
simple.qos.
see also: https://github.com/dtaht/sch_cake/commit/a66ee4fa355a62633b34fd05834075ea294e3b79
Did not switch cake over to it...
I still do not see any reason for precedence or diffserv8 to exist,
and can barely cope with the idea of diffserv4.
>
> Best Regards
> Sebastian
>
>
>> On Dec 20, 2015, at 13:52 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> the 200/20mbit tests I ran yesterday.
>>
>> http://snapon.cs.kau.se/~d/ptests/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cake mailing list
>> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-21 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-06 14:53 Dave Taht
2015-12-06 16:08 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-12-07 12:24 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-12-20 12:47 ` Dave Taht
2015-12-20 12:52 ` Dave Taht
2015-12-21 9:02 ` moeller0
2015-12-21 10:40 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2015-12-21 11:10 ` moeller0
2015-12-21 12:00 ` Dave Taht
2015-12-21 13:05 ` moeller0
2015-12-21 15:36 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-12-21 18:19 ` moeller0
2015-12-21 20:36 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-12-21 21:19 ` moeller0
[not found] ` <8737uukf7z.fsf@toke.dk>
2015-12-22 15:34 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-12-22 22:30 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-12-23 11:43 ` Dave Taht
2015-12-23 12:14 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-12-23 12:27 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-12-23 12:41 ` Dave Taht
2015-12-23 13:06 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-12-23 14:58 ` Dave Taht
2015-12-20 13:51 ` moeller0
2015-12-06 18:21 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw6NN2vWRjuB46eL69_tQqhBvLAvA8nAeH0TyYhiU1TsyQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox