From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Georgios Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] cake vs fqcodel with 1 client, 4 servers
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:06:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6SgU80_rur_x4pftXjk710dPJmEg9FcThnBL_eWw1_fw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512426648.21759.19.camel@gmail.com>
The puzzling thing about that graph is that you are only achieving 1.3
mbit in the ing case.
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Georgios Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com> wrote:
> I tried to simulate a situation resembling Windows
> updates/Steam/Torrents on a slow 10/2mbit connection.
>
> veth setup, 1 client, 4 servers
> setup.tgz:
> ./vsetup.sh
> ./sshd.sh
> ./vcake.sh
> ./mm.sh
>
> servers -- delay -- isp -- mbox -- client
> (4) 20ms 10/2mbit 9/1.8mbit (1)
>
> The client is creating in parallel 11 downstream and 2 upstream flows
> to *each* of the 4 servers.
> This was done by running 4 rrul_be_nflows tests in parallel.
>
> Cake vs HTB/fqcodel at mbox.
> Cake tested with ack-filter and ingress/egress.
>
> Cake ingress, as expected, achieves better latency at the cost of
> bandwidth. This does wonders on slow connections like mine.
>
> I will try to increase the number of clients to 4 and run some tests.
>
> George
--
Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-05 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-04 22:30 Georgios Amanakis
2017-12-05 0:06 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2017-12-05 1:13 ` Georgios Amanakis
2017-12-05 1:38 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-05 3:50 ` George Amanakis
2017-12-05 4:48 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-05 21:15 ` Dave Taht
2017-12-05 21:26 ` Georgios Amanakis
2017-12-05 22:39 ` xnor
2017-12-06 9:37 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-06 19:32 ` xnor
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE3MUfCuV_=GXAAOwvAXxee_dcJBaUkRVAEEWwyT5m7gAw@mail.gmail.com>
2017-12-07 1:59 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-07 2:27 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-07 2:30 ` George Amanakis
2017-12-07 2:58 ` George Amanakis
2017-12-07 3:04 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-07 3:08 ` Georgios Amanakis
2017-12-07 7:08 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-07 8:21 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-07 8:51 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2017-12-07 9:03 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-07 13:17 ` Georgios Amanakis
2017-12-07 22:12 ` xnor
2017-12-07 22:34 ` Georgios Amanakis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw6SgU80_rur_x4pftXjk710dPJmEg9FcThnBL_eWw1_fw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=gamanakis@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox