From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com (mail-ob0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2CB721F992 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbda8 with SMTP id da8so5095945obb.1 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:24:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CroNZo8KCmQbodEYgdpg94Qw+g899kWv851BaadghA0=; b=XZ4XoangQtum0PhG0hqLs89yFQmUySLVy/ibWT2fhXE81d4WofJESjQE9EdiQOtjsu UwHv155nXtZqI+VTR5NeC4mZfj4Hrfq3IETlkwESfPpOmx0tGrpM/DoWi3/smtgy8KpA lppQkBXWF0RTKJlulIdOmqsMi7pAMdYgy+l3zdp5dNGo7q78FdYrRllUcKCWVElSDEyS hZo6LwefhntcEfUZICcFHpFIuidOUhvMPRXc8eHFXidCFsjqKhrXZ2qawSFkbUnVmws3 zdsuEwEhrXeoEkrEvkp5mhTLU0JFwAFx+8aa4TLNn6K4WAJn1ewMWvBX9WW8xG0FiQRI u0ZA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.61.66 with SMTP id n2mr5135452obr.26.1443533082322; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.108.212 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:24:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fv1xl63n.fsf@toke.dk> References: <560A8CE0.7040503@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> <87fv1xl63n.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:24:42 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] is there a patch for tc-adv somewhere for showing active_flows X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:25:05 -0000 No it would be easiest to just submit a normal patch to iproute upstream, when the api is done. no muss, no fuss. But we are due for an api change. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes: > >> I've no idea how this then gets into upstream openwrt. > > One idea for this, which I tried poking into but didn't get to work: > Supposedly, iproute2 contains a facility to load qdisc support as a > shared library. If we could get this to work, we could include a > 'cake.so' for iproute along with the kernel module (or in a separate > package), and thus not have to replace the stock 'tc' package. That > would presumably be easier to upstream...(?) > > -Toke > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Do you want faster, better, wifi? https://www.patreon.com/dtaht