From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C5EA21F3C5
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 03:36:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by oies6 with SMTP id s6so94087039oie.1
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 03:36:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=FEaVPF51PBI0x09ceIkR8gfQMpYYG8j5xyCSdMHJecU=;
	b=mHQgJ7xbYPw24V+zLJWAgVW8k7+GtMwcXTtIxNmktsTkrY/8d/no+ubeecLYX7YFDk
	e9lGlSR9O5FvGCwEkrmnO+VYtZGBNqk8o4diQ8L5jW4TaIPDOTUSA+UqJsq6Uift+9xt
	myJ1txazciWh39Aed8CFl9XAhtBVnnSZFgEohXxgHy5MJSWaVseyYWVZnMZWZQV+5elS
	ks98vAo1/iOTDOFZARCdoePc+XSJsKQ/AXr+9MUykStpAYjnElJod4/6UGHqZD4T7AMj
	zWL3Lx35X4wOjDwTNcyfzDaSEtxy+F0sJigNZmWYOlo6saTrD7S6P8nLHYaTBWziQ7K7
	yE2Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.83.74 with SMTP id h71mr41649537oib.32.1448883366007;
	Mon, 30 Nov 2015 03:36:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.187.3 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 03:36:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <565C3378.2020300@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
References: <E4C3D637-78A9-41E1-B882-4FCE05D84B05@gmail.com>
	<CAO2eGh25cJ-DZ8gx4K9nkfpGPKXAsjaFu5=Mvb=CojPj3kt2fA@mail.gmail.com>
	<565C207D.7020309@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
	<CAO2eGh25Jtw=XuK_9e1uS8yKjiz=dn7ES7EFL+ccAiDHdKS5WA@mail.gmail.com>
	<565C316D.8070804@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
	<565C3378.2020300@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:36:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6g0TJF1zGph+7goSP-KNwaC2x4W86YzP-Oizz+11VkAw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] wash option not in tc-adv
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 11:36:29 -0000

yes, you typically do have to install (or re-install) tc-adv with the

opkg install --force-overwrite tc-adv

option. The ongoing goal of course is to get this stuff mainlined,
which we seem no closer to doing. I'd really hoped to get some good
performance numbers back this past weekend, and didn't. I do "feel"
that the revised codel model is not testing out as good as the one in
fq_codel, that on a variety of tests set associative hashing is not
seemingly worth it...

and boy, oh boy, does peeling have issues on the hardware I tried it on.