From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD4B0201B88 for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 15:19:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oica37 with SMTP id a37so92077127oic.0 for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 15:19:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rOZSmvx6WdyjA7oay6wwBFfebuV5zXS2LitF7qLrfBk=; b=ayCScbSKdT66f6Q5WrDwYU+6X/r/piMWcwhV2YxjI3sfp2lzGqsy7DZkhUlJsJ/Xs3 uR/BS2jYQp9GXCNp32+OmOD8A3Ucixh3O3Pbnb7nXTC625oWSyjw/r9aRsI9mWwB3LwW 9DdY/LMXcuOyVT4ddjHOkiuEaexg6Ldl4vW8xidCwTq8XCxHV+CMl2Rf/HxIZZI+YDdx HsV0UqqDAM04ne0X7b3aRlWQIs3q9N+6wcpqt4R4d/GMmUI4PcgD0x9IGUU7V/zEDgx9 /3MysGyffFRyZMlEdeNTDge9EVCe9dhcmQ5zojyWDh+dwz1Q3bJZgTcUH94y3sh+M2Xo 9r0Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.216.87 with SMTP id p84mr5621592oig.133.1431296344399; Sun, 10 May 2015 15:19:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.71.139 with HTTP; Sun, 10 May 2015 15:19:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5AD2A17C-9956-44C7-A20F-2A2463E68535@gmx.de> References: <554F64E1.6000609@gmail.com> <554F9594.60808@gmail.com> <5AD2A17C-9956-44C7-A20F-2A2463E68535@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 15:19:04 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Sebastian Moeller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] openwrt build with latest cake and other qdiscs X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 22:19:34 -0000 no, that is not how cake works. I think. On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > HI Alan, > > I believe we got side tracked while discussing cake=E2=80=99s atm adaptat= ion layer, but with a bit of luck you could use tc=E2=80=99s stab option to= add the overhead and leave the atm encapsulation to cake (which does a bet= ter job than stab). If you could try and report back that would be helpful.= I am a bit in a hurry, but will have more time next week to help out if ne= ed be=E2=80=A6 > > > Best Regards > Sebastian > > On May 10, 2015, at 19:29 , Alan Jenkins wrote: > >> Hi again >> >> I tested Dave's build of cake on wndr3800. (Didn't try specifying cake2= /cake3; I'm guessing tc cake means cake3 on there). "atm" adjustment worke= d fine on my adsl. I can't distinguish it from sqm-scripts with the same c= onfiguration. >> >> SQM seems to win from having "overhead 40", which I can't configure in c= ake. >> >> >> up / kbit/s >> down / kbit/s >> overhead / bytes >> Median RRUL / ms >> SQM >> 16000 >> 950 >> 0 >> 74 >> Cake >> 17175 >> 995 >> 0 >> 76 >> >> >> >> >> >> Cake >> 16000 >> 950 >> 0 >> 74 >> SQM >> 17175 >> 995 >> 40 >> 70 >> >> >> >> >> >> DSL sync rate >> 17619 >> 1020 >> >> 59 >> >> IMO it wouldn't hurt for 'tc atm', 'tc adsl', and everything else to def= ault to 'overhead 44'. (The highest overhead Seb reported; the original wo= rst case overhead[1] plus a vlan header for IPTV). >> >> Alan >> >> [1] http://ace-host.stuart.id.au/russell/files/tc/tc-atm/#usage >> _______________________________________________ >> Cake mailing list >> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake > > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67