From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A64521F778 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 01:17:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbrx8 with SMTP id rx8so848973obb.3 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 01:17:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=md8EepiwoO7CMb2auPjtpz+SeYIPYUg3tOm1Dcq/BmA=; b=lVC98qHDl02sKk9jhpNiqUZPzXkUgBsXJKJOczU3An19DrWtwZrcv7bjs3wRTLW45J E/ZMtLHbq+FWxj+zv2As0tRuyvvmB0L+BfCd+Hes3/V9RdrGQGyMunIsPE+io0QwUycg EhCq0kSShwTLabSORERe0x8Z3xV8nravQAHtAWChCE6FReyowZc7OCd8eBuzkuMT4swX 5CUTJgPx8F4RGkZWzTwqeGARKTWmfuFgM27oiRY5Q989xIDTOI+ZeLdxPBrVjshLWDbh 2/KCDjaVO9zC6aZRGe126kG0yaOwkGnpUNrR71K3giW+zlIJS5lTobAwWVDv5XxUdguH nB1g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.18.103 with SMTP id v7mr14980638obd.73.1444637876236; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 01:17:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.108.212 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 01:17:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <561B6B76.5090603@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> References: <561B6B76.5090603@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:17:56 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] Help with the AQM layer X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:18:19 -0000 no, I missed your branch and announcement entirely. On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > Hi Logan, > > On 08/10/15 I pushed an 'exposeinterval' feature branch to both mine & > dave's sch_cake & tc-adv repos (so module & user side changes) which > exposed the interval (rtt) parameter. By the following morning it even > worked! On Morning of 11th Dave sent an email "adding 'rtt' support > correctly" to which I rather assumed my 'exposeinterval' branch was > superfluous, incorrect and unneeded so I removed them from Dave's repos > in the expectation of great things. > > You'll still find my original versions of that branch > https://github.com/kdarbyshirebryant/sch_cake/tree/exposeinterval & > https://github.com/kdarbyshirebryant/tc-adv/tree/exposeinterval > > A glance over Dave's patch suggests the only difference to the > 'rtt/interval' side of things between his & mine is using nanoseconds in > the pass from user-space to kernel space rather than my use of millisecon= ds. > > If you provide tc with a 'rtt 300ms' parameter it should work a treat. > > Kevin > > > On 12/10/15 08:47, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I'm reading about this on the website: >> >> " >> The AQM layer has no configuration options. However, it is planned to >> add simple tuning options for different prevailing RTTs that may be >> significantly different from the Internet-scale 100ms currently >> assumed. Satellite links tend to impose longer RTTs, and enclosed LANs >> tend to have much shorter RTTs. >> " >> >> In Mauritius, and other african countries, we have RTT of around >> 300-400 ms. Could someone please point me to where I should look for >> adding a tunable for this in the source files ? >> >> >> Kind regards, >> //Logan >> C-x-C-c >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cake mailing list >> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Do you want faster, better, wifi? https://www.patreon.com/dtaht