From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net>
Cc: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>,
"Cake List" <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] lockup with cake and veth
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 12:40:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6urUxpbOfNUKdyKYEr-V78ANXtEW5Q8v9Q+dUdZ6WS6Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82EEB9CD-E441-4639-9592-A2429681EE0E@heistp.net>
You ran out of queue to store for that rtt.
netem limit 100000 or higher for that.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 12:25 PM Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net> wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 6, 2018, at 3:37 PM, Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net> wrote:
> >
> > I’m also satisfied for now that this shouldn’t hold us up. However, what I’ll also want to try next is netem on a separate veth device from cake. I believe Dave’s veth testing earlier was using three namespaces / veth devices, maybe for this reason(?)
>
> So under the category of “unsurprising”, with netem as a root qdisc in a separate namespace/veth device from cake, there is no lockup. The attached script creates an environment with 6 namespaces (client, client qdisc, client delay, server delay, server qdisc, server) with veth devices / bridges between. It’s easy to switch the qdisc or netem params, if anyone needs such a thing.
>
> Only, I wonder if high BDP links can be emulated with netem. Say I want 10gbit with 100ms rtt. If I use “netem delay 50ms” each direction, rtt is correct, but throughput for iperf3 drops from 30Gbit to 450Mbit. CPU is a few percent, so that’s not the issue. Fiddling with TCP window (iperf3 -w) just seems to make it worse. So I’m still figuring out netem, I guess...
>
> Pete
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
--
Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-06 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-06 13:17 Pete Heist
2018-07-06 13:29 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-07-06 13:34 ` Georgios Amanakis
2018-07-06 13:37 ` Pete Heist
2018-07-06 19:24 ` Pete Heist
2018-07-06 19:40 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2018-07-06 22:12 ` Pete Heist
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw6urUxpbOfNUKdyKYEr-V78ANXtEW5Q8v9Q+dUdZ6WS6Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=pete@heistp.net \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox