Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 4

[Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 4, 2017, at 4:29 AM, Dave Taht <dave@taht.net> wrote:
>
>
> *** Round 5 Plans
>
> * If I do another high RTT test, make rtt 1000ms default and try even higher
>
> * From Dave: tcp bbr, cdg, reno? dctcp would be weirdly interesting.
>
> * From Dave: slot 4ms 4ms bytes 10k 16
>
> * If I get time I could change flenter to do asymmetric bandwidth tests and
> go
> back to Dave’s four box config with ingress cake, which would probably be a
> more
> common config. All depends on time available…
>
>
> Well, let's see what happens on netdev.
>
> I took a few steps towards ripping out blue for comparison the other
> day.
>
>
> Ok, irtt needs shoring up before its first “pre-release release”, likely to
> be in mid-December. I’ll focus on that with what time I have (which is less
> now until the new year) until more is known.
>
> I think we can say Cake is stable and helps in many situations over what’s
> currently available. There are smaller mysteries in different corners, but
> they usually come down to something like:
>
> - the queue has been lost
> - it's configured wrong
> - that’s how it should be
> - the device or driver isn’t working right
> - the device is multi-queue
> - the cpu is over-taxed
> - the timer resolution isn’t high enough
>
> Maybe we can make these deployment issues easier for people to deal with
> over time, first through documentation, then proposing and implementing
> solutions if they become clear. Overall though, I’m glad Cake is available,
> because in many situations people can just add a few keywords and enjoy the
> benefits…

"sch_cake cookbook"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>



-- 

Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619