From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com (mail-ob0-x235.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1D6621F34E
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 03:02:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obbww6 with SMTP id ww6so10196758obb.0
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 03:02:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=1Qa7NRSGXoUx7OULrl/dZKUSm7DBkMgSIRBcdizxBnM=;
	b=yANxfaJAFikL0XrPf3JQd3hdGMxmMjSZ4BgFwYbSBuInmCVliyeO/XMpD8RzEbyALN
	x/WB2tpotInZE7MJoEeqqfTusH9cqF9BUQun2oZIjwF9LG97puQPvFF3fIWZo04wvpPZ
	rXCQurlzI53asJvxUuLhaFiQA5odUyffLXyxcIY4CY9ddw405bwUw0Q2YLW3uc0UOEHF
	5itqtM5QO/WOVnCQTjb0VZTx+6foxUzUtbJo9DBejO49haE4ZfDMjEaINuTwB6mQdaRo
	NgVts9uK/kc22CWC4+srHE0rAglnGcSH/voIAGMdjbQgVnTwIO59/lapbtEV1POBFVMK
	u4Vg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.148.164 with SMTP id tt4mr6938659obb.25.1448362959737;
	Tue, 24 Nov 2015 03:02:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.50.130 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 03:02:39 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:02:39 +0100
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7Bcg_4CotL0ZRVtuBgNadkWj0-3wLwOkOgV1vwjCvBdg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "cake@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Cake] Test results
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:03:03 -0000

up until a few moments ago I had assumed that cake was peeling...

and I was composing an email talking about how all cake's optimizations
seemed not to be any better, and in some cases, worse, than sqm-scripts
in all the test series with offloads on I ran last week. Now I know....

I was prepping to rip out a lot of the stuff that we have not tested at
scale - like the invsqrt cache, most of the other mods to codel, and then
take a hard look at the target and quantum calculations.

one thing I think would be helpful to everyone is to start publishing
test results, as well as perf results for arm, mips, and x86_64.

But I am not sure what people would find useful.