From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22f.google.com (mail-ob0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA2EE21F778 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 00:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbzf10 with SMTP id zf10so101296818obb.2 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 00:55:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5dBk3m58EyNm0p5HVhkxcpkUf8KgWD6/fqWf44dhQVM=; b=t74B8OD2ux2Vxc9AqprRCtDtAbhe+82cLeg49Zz4X/zy75WTTVGHw7X0DOBoEqb3Pe pmOwnqbvn4qz2yh9wqgKtw0J+BvKaFfGeFUyW95phOzu3x3Rs9IShpDyP7b9qDIsgHgn BpUmkpv7l6+d7tuqqREUb6sdJM1BFt5zq5NrKWrQg5yS5D4uxZ5n4VWykHT9wChqz/DM M1OC974wOsHLCBXqc+/0k1UIfF4KUcATU7zCOERCXOj+/d7UMSNsZNsaI0Eq2Dge3XsB Lx39qkO9K4YuPpQrAxTr9cQ+EI0XS90oL2TO5wHN3CkEHzxPAlVQfd8vbamp5PrQbTmt OP6w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.41.9 with SMTP id b9mr14841363oel.37.1444636502586; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 00:55:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.108.212 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 00:55:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:55:02 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Jonathan Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] start at interval handling X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 07:55:26 -0000 On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Jonathan Morton wr= ote: > >> On 12 Oct, 2015, at 00:30, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> so... anyway, this does start some api breakage, also. Anyone else got >> braincells? > > Some of that is definitely wrong. The rate_overhead parameter needs to b= e signed, for a start, since some last-mile encapsulations have *less* over= head than Ethernet. That=E2=80=99s why I had it as =E2=80=98short=E2=80=99= instead of =E2=80=98u16=E2=80=99. A point being that I am having my life eaten by politics and the rtt parameter and the dual hash thing, are the only two things left that need to get done in cake so far as I know. And it's your code, primarily, and there are plenty of people, willing to contribute and - especially - help test. We are one last day, one last big push, away from getting this thing done. A hackathon with everybody, perhaps, to get there? > > - Jonathan Morton > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Do you want faster, better, wifi? https://www.patreon.com/dtaht