From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] ack filter rrul result at 1000/100
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 19:45:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7H9YsrXAqq-aAb55s715FfR35MVbt35S6mFyU+DjNWFQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw50mhOUOR7cnicjC2KSx65BqUqXFnZtJBc2fe_O_4C8Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Please disregard that result entirely, my test setup was wrong and I
jumped for joy too early.
(turned out on the second run I'd rate limited the wrong interface
also to 100mbit)
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> I pulled together rmounce's patchset for ack filtering and my own
> ongoing netem work and had a chance to run a few tests.
>
> Pretty remarkable. The attached graph is a 1gbit (unshaped) link up
> with a 100Mbit down, the classic rrul 4 upload and 4 download flows,
> with the ping measurement....
>
> Just an across the board win, unless the tcp gods rain hellfire down
> on us. And wow, look at all those acks that got killed.
>
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 1
> memory used: 317312b of 5000000b
> capacity estimate: 100Mbit
> Bulk Best Effort Voice
> thresh 6250Kbit 100Mbit 25Mbit
> target 5.0ms 5.0ms 5.0ms
> interval 100.0ms 100.0ms 10.0ms
> pk_delay 2us 10us 53us
> av_delay 1us 1us 4us
> sp_delay 1us 1us 3us
> pkts 228783 1937474 631425
> bytes 104982588 1189472341 380759260
> way_inds 0 0 0
> way_miss 6 63 19
> way_cols 0 0 0
> drops 6076 2091 1993
> marks 0 0 0
> ack_drop 67510 135880 102528
> sp_flows 0 1 0
> bk_flows 0 0 1
> un_flows 0 0 0
> max_len 6056 15140 10598
>
>
> --
>
> Dave Täht
> CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> http://www.teklibre.com
> Tel: 1-669-226-2619
--
Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-16 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-16 3:13 Dave Taht
2017-11-16 3:45 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2017-11-16 4:28 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-16 11:30 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-16 13:55 ` Bret Towe
2017-11-16 14:29 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-16 14:33 ` Bret Towe
2017-11-16 15:03 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-16 16:25 ` Dave Taht
[not found] <mailman.1021.1510806526.3609.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-11-16 9:24 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-16 12:47 ` Alan Jenkins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw7H9YsrXAqq-aAb55s715FfR35MVbt35S6mFyU+DjNWFQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox