From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x231.google.com (mail-qt0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10F623B2A4 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 22:45:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qt0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 8so39558396qtv.1 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 19:45:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iLM2ezvEubd/24ZfJcLU76R1NwqDYoZ4Ha8BFzJN+wc=; b=QPFofwO+cQ/34o6FQ9+RL8vhpiTdBFR7qiVQOg+qCCchUv2TKk5P7y/Is69Cwm7MfW OYbyF0WjFZfm+mzn4gjwYPPSUeQv2WsQjt0BMVXPkv+Oan9Rg1RfzL6rLDuN0XdUyeDy iNBI2c8gItfkKWRDE1691oG5h3Hx98UY6T1ryjEFARskt87QLkhWRxW4EiuBdAhtZF62 E4AUBvcSDGGUTcS4kSTc3/SLcbHqg1GV2M8Gi3eVe4YERWG70S0iwoHkEerfGiQi8Okx YzjT9Wl4cG/QBlu3KkLRFNl0c6m8wMmCl+HrMVlqaW2cLYpN1qTpmClo21c2PuJO035y DR0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iLM2ezvEubd/24ZfJcLU76R1NwqDYoZ4Ha8BFzJN+wc=; b=iNmt1CZqeyFGtR+GHIUfZP2HdYp5KtqCq2sn69DHwTEvIUfm4n+SuXAdXx+E2yzdIl 7vKZBxVOn6W1WDKrSzW0fzrznME8Kr3PnLXbb4bUISY9KD53+sRdtr/5Ln9zp/jnx90z eu2dFnzmKFqx3L7V9VgzzUdvArtcwxlxWl1fDH20KPMqMvfEf3qHyzt3upKWFLSi7g4m o/lF1gEmyYFGpzK7mHpOStjUzV5fGuewXRnlEPXM5LW8dEoFD8A4V0ip0Fi8Jztclzff C52pelo5QX0sl584yIBuEX4UrUGvYEQoU6ju0jc0K0KpidcKnkOPiIlL4E9zizuRM+Gv Zr8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6dIthdrWMQX9Ylz7S4EAR7SzeqlN74Pua+uSTXfRSnqmL6WsnV 0w6XT5YdTNHKXGCAaRCYyaFV8R0debUkAXwT+uo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZMgwlWwCTRJxn4Ak9q12deOwZyAYmqA6Rd+KMqa3VBnwDk5ClRAzmBKOG5wvsKG2PO/34lkUKqQvtEuCIOdPY= X-Received: by 10.200.40.54 with SMTP id 51mr407791qtq.339.1510803952455; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 19:45:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.193.93 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 19:45:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Dave Taht Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 19:45:52 -0800 Message-ID: To: Cake List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] ack filter rrul result at 1000/100 X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 03:45:53 -0000 Please disregard that result entirely, my test setup was wrong and I jumped for joy too early. (turned out on the second run I'd rate limited the wrong interface also to 100mbit) On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > I pulled together rmounce's patchset for ack filtering and my own > ongoing netem work and had a chance to run a few tests. > > Pretty remarkable. The attached graph is a 1gbit (unshaped) link up > with a 100Mbit down, the classic rrul 4 upload and 4 download flows, > with the ping measurement.... > > Just an across the board win, unless the tcp gods rain hellfire down > on us. And wow, look at all those acks that got killed. > > backlog 0b 0p requeues 1 > memory used: 317312b of 5000000b > capacity estimate: 100Mbit > Bulk Best Effort Voice > thresh 6250Kbit 100Mbit 25Mbit > target 5.0ms 5.0ms 5.0ms > interval 100.0ms 100.0ms 10.0ms > pk_delay 2us 10us 53us > av_delay 1us 1us 4us > sp_delay 1us 1us 3us > pkts 228783 1937474 631425 > bytes 104982588 1189472341 380759260 > way_inds 0 0 0 > way_miss 6 63 19 > way_cols 0 0 0 > drops 6076 2091 1993 > marks 0 0 0 > ack_drop 67510 135880 102528 > sp_flows 0 1 0 > bk_flows 0 0 1 > un_flows 0 0 0 > max_len 6056 15140 10598 > > > -- > > Dave T=C3=A4ht > CEO, TekLibre, LLC > http://www.teklibre.com > Tel: 1-669-226-2619 --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-669-226-2619