From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 876263B2A4
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu,  9 Feb 2017 15:46:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id s140so18146840qke.0
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:46:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=qQTTd3EFm/LkZcONLvJjbpPaJfda4JJ0EHHqII31oS8=;
 b=Zdi6oVm+A675ASn8FJeD+WIZxmwSXP22lyoElHA4QD/1Ok0ZVhT9enhDqGKwb5g1I6
 39mDMl14Ur+vvZQQ15wV9lBJBiriDhVj8zocCdVuh7nd9lK0f2FBXKV/2/poVtPpXqLY
 DA7JofLIZDSCvKkKv7WOXinnchreytye/n6y6cVbbYXno4+ahw63MfxSUu8sX213dppS
 mPVIfckDJAYSHOUDzSmyF8Ru4r+OcfkVBnjzOOJeglpZnrgEt3a7EsxnUaBiP8gudFWj
 w1SRQ5pffhCPKx976ASBeBxL+vzgDXRbPvLjIzarLgKxhfBLNNDp+XeoeP4/3aO03vgD
 QQtw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=qQTTd3EFm/LkZcONLvJjbpPaJfda4JJ0EHHqII31oS8=;
 b=KgkHDG147F8MxG8Nz63pY0MpNaFWV4/wTVZevyRKkI8yxEGbIYoRJkrlQA9Xl8zvUj
 XAmwwWWbCeGovJIJ/59YzNxMRRfsygX7m8EDpEkVJXs4guOOEq523CksoZp4YyIdG0qd
 LaJnZFRFLulZzU0VQ17eOnwB0gI4qquwPtUtGmAuE+0dfyooAY9G5n3G/1bAI8dYKml9
 +ZimdMHSiXhCC2Wp+4aYQ/XeN2RS3L2GFLhQUExnq/+eajV2FeF/KgizDk9BuvZ135CS
 rmHdrqWgGKXKVvFe2ATLlA3WY9SZRG4/mmdTfjOLnsP6WRca2kM12ec5gi/rDQ0YkRzR
 cOHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mflcnKF3eJgQAFxnNgrpN8x9CXJs5pW82DVMfZWtp2q+AGTEkk5EHgYjuOGwn5+s1di7dbcrOo8tsxBw==
X-Received: by 10.55.26.218 with SMTP id l87mr5322940qkh.59.1486673200931;
 Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:46:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.142.132 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:46:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:46:40 -0800
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7K4pKhmE7oAP+4VPHeg-jbM_iwUKU-zUdq0SFHE0QMEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Cake] improving cake hashing?
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 20:46:41 -0000

My original thought was we could leverage skb->hash just as fq_codel
is now in linux head, but that seems to be exclusive of doing
nat/conntrack...

https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/MHEQ2jMw1e3

--=20
Dave T=C3=A4ht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
http://blog.cerowrt.org