From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] new 12 core box
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 11:41:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7NHHCv5u=NHRN_RTOgmSts5cwb_vbLs5v=OYqYAZPdxw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2FBCB733-0125-4A2E-BBC5-385E25759F24@gmail.com>
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2017, at 6:07 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I like the name. “dornierdox” doesn’t have the same smooth ring:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dornier_Do_X (Powerplant: 12× Curtiss
> Conqueror water-cooled V12)
>
>
> Heh. I had not heard of that plane. Ceiling, 500 feet.
>
>
> "As a result of its size, passengers were asked to crowd together on
> one side or the other to help make turns. "
>
> very apt analogy for these mailing lists!
>
>
> Indeed. "A successor, the Do-20, was envisioned by Dornier, but never
> advanced beyond the design study stage.”
>
> Really? I’m shocked.
>
> Who decides to build that?
>
> Howard Hughes?
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hughes_H-4_Hercules
>
>
> Another behemoth...
>
> I still think a box like that will be useful for veth testing.
>
>
> I put it through some paces last night, trying 4Gbit workloads.
>
>
> I’ve been really happy with the 2x APU2 you suggested, for their four cores
> and silence. I even think 2-3 more of them could be useful for different
> testing topologies as we discussed.
>
>
> I like them a lot, too. We have to come up with a test that uses up 3
> ethernet ports...
>
>
> I have just such a test planned, as a middlebox for poor-man’s full-duplex
> p2p WiFi. One port in, one for egress and one for ingress, same on the other
> end of the link. I tried it last year with 2xAPUv1 but one link was still a
> cable because I didn’t have four NSM5s, so the results looked artificially
> good. Now I have them, so it’s just a matter of setting it up again...
Cool. Another idea for a test is a real torrent or 5 of a really big
well distributed file on one etherport, while a set of hosts do
normal-home like things on the other, with cake unlimited vs fq-codel,
and bandwidth limited for both. We don't have good numbers for cake at
line rate in a scenario where we can dump 2Gbit into 1 in the real
world.
--
Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-03 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-02 22:10 Dave Taht
2017-12-03 11:37 ` Pete Heist
2017-12-03 17:04 ` Dave Taht
2017-12-03 17:07 ` Dave Taht
2017-12-03 19:26 ` Pete Heist
2017-12-03 19:41 ` Dave Taht [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAA93jw7NHHCv5u=NHRN_RTOgmSts5cwb_vbLs5v=OYqYAZPdxw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=peteheist@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox