I wish we had a good way to monitor cpu usage over the course of a test like this. On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > "cake" is the most current code. Please use that. I suspect you just ran > into the hard bandwidth/QoS implementation in the older code. > > I had not got around to trying the "atm" option in cake, which tries to > compensate for cell size also. So you should enable that - and I havent > added support for it to sqm either! > > On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Alan Jenkins < > alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi again >> >> I tested Dave's build of cake on wndr3800. (Didn't try specifying >> cake2/cake3; I'm guessing tc cake means cake3 on there). "atm" adjustment >> worked fine on my adsl. I can't distinguish it from sqm-scripts with the >> same configuration. >> >> SQM seems to win from having "overhead 40", which I can't configure in >> cake. >> >> >> up / kbit/s >> >> down / kbit/s >> >> overhead / bytes >> >> Median RRUL / ms >> >> SQM >> >> 16000 >> >> 950 >> >> 0 >> >> 74 >> >> Cake >> >> 17175 >> >> 995 >> >> 0 >> >> 76 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cake >> >> 16000 >> >> 950 >> >> 0 >> >> 74 >> >> SQM >> >> 17175 >> >> 995 >> >> 40 >> >> 70 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> DSL sync rate >> >> 17619 >> >> 1020 >> >> >> 59 >> >> IMO it wouldn't hurt for 'tc atm', 'tc adsl', and everything else to >> default to 'overhead 44'. (The highest overhead Seb reported; the original >> worst case overhead[1] plus a vlan header for IPTV). >> >> Alan >> >> [1] http://ace-host.stuart.id.au/russell/files/tc/tc-atm/#usage >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cake mailing list >> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake >> >> > > > -- > Dave Täht > Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67 > -- Dave Täht Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67