From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD5DC21F31F
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sat, 23 May 2015 10:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obcus9 with SMTP id us9so32306910obc.2
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sat, 23 May 2015 10:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=rLcJogZwLs8dejulzEfK9yKzFAJrpABjrHj6gac+56Y=;
	b=bAQzMwBoCQfwlclGqeg6COe83Gl5uzFopeRQCg48u4D5PBvN11PzyDwag7dRTx7Nkw
	XlA8cKsuXSNgh22eINgVRbqO6S+lR7m/5TmvBJOkScjZdcotAwzQ5uCP6p3/aXC3eu8v
	WwHRCGDEIbKC2f98CWmXbYd9yPN1AXj8jQLe6UbeyBIJBUG6kgbxAvQrmOHRg/nGLe0d
	a4W8r2wh2Zxs8HRmpqVxp+/qRR84Q+gF5PMIIkSNVUWJCrajWOqS9fKIeSei3Mqcge6j
	1LOYnMoi7piqeWF0dg51FESbqgtyPZUZismY9rfC9DNL6Av34O/f8dLNmbzc48W1wwlR
	fhVg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.223.131 with SMTP id w125mr10535920oig.108.1432403162741;
	Sat, 23 May 2015 10:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.105.146 with HTTP; Sat, 23 May 2015 10:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 10:46:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7RushJDaSpZZ0kwcqxBqge5=DJo4=tLWkeUXz91OB1Ng@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Cake] peeling at sub-1ms
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 17:46:56 -0000

I think I would be happier if we peeled at 250usec rather than 1ms. At
110Mbit that is 2 packets, but at a gig quite a lot.

(selfishly, that is the speed I am running at while watching
dslreports misbehave)

The second problem is that the default peeling behavior somehow should
work while at line rate, whether the rate be 10mbit or a gbit.

I am going to go try the former, now....

--=20
Dave T=C3=A4ht
Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**

https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67