Re: [Cake] [PATCH net-next] sched: sch_cake: Align QoS treatment to Windows and Zoom

[Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>]

ok, I concede on NQB. Do we at least have agreement that CS5 belongs
in the VI queue, not the VO queue, on diffserv4?

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 9:43 AM Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 10 Jan, 2025, at 7:07 pm, Dave Taht via Cake <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >
> > I do not think NQB belongs in Voice (which shares priority with
> > netcontrol, etc). I also do not think it belongs in best effort as the
> > intent is to get a quick response to a short flow. yes, FQ solves a
> > lot of problems, but
>
> As far as I'm concerned, FQ implements everything that NQB wants.  In a system implementing FQ, treating NQB traffic as best-effort is the Right Thing.
>
> And I second the notion that slavishly copying wthe broken default behaviour of WiFi routers is the Wrong Thing.
>
>  - Jonathan Morton
>


-- 
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos