From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x231.google.com (mail-oi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D38C921F9B0 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:26:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oiww128 with SMTP id w128so4696406oiw.2 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:26:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=C4oFlIOaKyQ6vlebRRCgGG5OARppgf/fsWPwgPGSa9Q=; b=z8apzdYPaLB80fEVTfy5si3rCiGgGT512NSJQwfL/yhmh5hrNHCCXuqaIqztwcRkgY gya12WRUDBHmJji7DNmmCwo9vLo+BegTYZf5KaqgkC5pBjrHCDK5SVmZ2WrjyrpJtyd4 4OOFd3LT3EdSbXCWbLAQv/Sk61CpYA7Xlw5oC3Bs/0N2jhNgBfp5B3XV7Dy3hYj0G926 RVyIomVBlQ4WxUSlMDaDuA5YBEfr9G3tIyaKiljgBAl7iBSYWhyBsJ2Cm/LGeSPPDs6v L81e1hYf3aEja9+uf6S+nJWJHMfaX8bV1hGPnPJPqud/+w4YxLiOJFV3zi4FEbHGfN5C iZyQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.203.194 with SMTP id b185mr14227866oig.104.1443536779469; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:26:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.108.212 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:26:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9FDD2A6B-B30F-4C5B-BE18-D60779C1BABF@gmx.de> References: <560A8CE0.7040503@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> <87fv1xl63n.fsf@toke.dk> <9FDD2A6B-B30F-4C5B-BE18-D60779C1BABF@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:26:19 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Sebastian Moeller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] is there a patch for tc-adv somewhere for showing active_flows X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:26:43 -0000 On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > HI Dave, hi list, > > On Sep 29, 2015, at 15:24 , Dave Taht wrote: > >> No it would be easiest to just submit a normal patch to iproute >> upstream, when the api is done. no muss, no fuss. But we are due for >> an api change. > > What change is due? Sorry to ask, but I genuinely seem to have mi= ssed the cake boat=E2=80=A6 We can delete two variables from xstats (lastcount and one other). We need to add support for at least setting the interval (I do not think we want to expose the target). You have made other suggestions. I would like to be able to hash on src/dst src and dst macaddrs also, but that's not an api change. other needed api changes? > Best Regards > Sebastian > >> >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: >>> Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes: >>> >>>> I've no idea how this then gets into upstream openwrt. >>> >>> One idea for this, which I tried poking into but didn't get to work: >>> Supposedly, iproute2 contains a facility to load qdisc support as a >>> shared library. If we could get this to work, we could include a >>> 'cake.so' for iproute along with the kernel module (or in a separate >>> package), and thus not have to replace the stock 'tc' package. That >>> would presumably be easier to upstream...(?) >>> >>> -Toke >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cake mailing list >>> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave T=C3=A4ht >> Do you want faster, better, wifi? https://www.patreon.com/dtaht >> _______________________________________________ >> Cake mailing list >> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Do you want faster, better, wifi? https://www.patreon.com/dtaht