From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0230F21F2B7 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:31:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbbh8 with SMTP id bh8so57473476obb.0 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 06:31:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=y9UX6DRJHEniFhQEM2YDABdsRXZeSgCtMc3MaAXQT1E=; b=fueS5Yn1SnsoPSgG2HkIR2hw0OC40cofu2ROcuNlqcKs6RY9tEhTGGm8Sya2jcjr/z Kes00jyqrVieySnb2AWn0mVs/te9fe9i2x+3ohowBt6/so8ygsKm2gexcxdlrysKqTWs Ml9+awMP4sLrtdIT3kfD7Bfw0Rpb8JAFVLqa+s8u82V8MrvyuNVrg14ONJkAIt8lCSXL pY9Ni5GL4LEJJQpYUxOtYs7pdNSW2+vNW8qEF/cX55x7gsrSJKn6u0yd4jO8t1noivfK CaEBxG7LuZPuGbj6MgYfLYah89yVPz9N1VxHUksrEW/xlOHMmgHeTHfnhd5+WMW2RllV NKYQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.118.202 with SMTP id ko10mr5743266obb.25.1443706318946; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 06:31:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.108.212 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:31:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <560D2074.1070205@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> References: <560A8CE0.7040503@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> <87fv1xl63n.fsf@toke.dk> <9FDD2A6B-B30F-4C5B-BE18-D60779C1BABF@gmx.de> <560BB1AC.4050506@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> <55822F58-63E5-4A5F-8B89-77D22F46C2D0@gmx.de> <560D2074.1070205@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:31:58 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] is there a patch for tc-adv somewhere for showing active_flows X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 13:32:22 -0000 you now have commit access to both the sch_cake and tc-adv repos. Anyone else want direct access? On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > > > On 30/09/15 12:28, Dave Taht wrote: >> at the moment it seems best to keep working these out of tree versions, = imho. > > The 'problem' with that Dave is that there are people here keen to be on > the latest commits so that they may test the latest 'n' greatest code. > Who doesn't want a willing set of fools^H^H^H^H^H^H testers trying to > break code for free? :-) > > You've mentioned how great it is that things have been moving well > recently, yes it is! I'd say that some of that is down to someone in > essence doing a bit of janitorial work in collecting commits together > and pushing them into a central-ish repo, namely yours. Personally > speaking sending to your repo makes more sense as that's where the > ceropackages repo points the openwrt users to go (well I think that's > the case anyway) > > None of this is rocket surgery/brain science, somehow even I seem > capable of merging repos/commits, but having some sort of idea in which > repo active development is taking place so it can be collated & tested > would be a very nice thing :-) > > From what I can work out at the moment, your github sch-cake repo is > where you & JM work on the cake module, so hasn't diverged. JM appears > to work on iproute/tc in Toke's iproute2 repo, but you work on > iproute/tc in your github/tc-adv repo - they did diverge a little, with > trivial merge conflicts. Are there any more? What have I missed? > > Apologies, I'm a little frustrated by other events at the moment and I > think that may have spilled into this email as well....no hurt/insult > intended. > > Kevin > >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Sebastian Moeller wro= te: >>> Jonathan, >>> >>> is Tokes repository the next best to master, or will all eventually acc= umulate in Dave=E2=80=99s repository? I just wonder which iproute2 to actua= lly build on my test machine ;) >>> >>> Best Regards >>> Sebastian >>> >>> On Sep 30, 2015, at 11:55 , Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: >>> >>>> Dave, >>>> >>>> I've pulled the commits from Toke's iproute2 repo in which Jonathan is >>>> placing his stats & other tweaks and sent you a pull request: >>>> https://github.com/dtaht/tc-adv/pull/3 to get them into your tc-adv re= po >>>> (which is slightly more cero/openwrt facing) >>>> >>>> All the recent changes to cake & tc are running here.... livin' on the >>>> bleeding edge :-) >>>> >>>> Kevin >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 29/09/15 16:22, Jonathan Morton wrote: >>>>> The big api change is in the stats output, which I'm still working >>>>> on. As a stop gap, I have already pushed a version with both sparse >>>>> and bulk flows reporting. >>>>> >>>>> The config api is inherently extensible. >>>>> >>>>> - Jonathan Morton >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Cake mailing list >>>>> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net >>>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Cake mailing list >>>> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net >>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cake mailing list >>> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Do you want faster, better, wifi? https://www.patreon.com/dtaht