Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "Dave Täht" <dave@taht.net>
Cc: Luca MUSCARIELLO <luca.muscariello@gmail.com>,
	Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	aqm@ietf.org,  bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] [Bloat] paper: per flow fairness in a data center network
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 09:21:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7qbwKdj8iDNw+Qj6=V7LvOK5sOK=d5aEVw36EWUge-Nw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sgyyg1in.fsf@taht.net>

Found the PDF. Much more readable.

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/nexus-9000-series-switches/white-paper-c11-738488.pdf

As much lust as I have in my heart for this switch, it costs as much
as a car! Sigh.

On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 9:09 AM Dave Taht <dave@taht.net> wrote:
>
> Luca Muscariello <luca.muscariello@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I disagree on the claims that DC switches do not implement anything.
> > They do, from quite some time now.
> >
> > https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/nexus-9000-series-switches/white-paper-c11-738488.html
>
> I'm really impressed. I'd have probably heard about it if they'd
> mentioned bufferbloat once :/.
>
> The graphs comparing their performance to arista's are far, far, far too
> small to read. You can certainly see a huge improvement on mice in this
> paper.
>
> is there a better copy of this paper around?
>
> What's the cheapest form of this switch I can buy? (or beg, borrow, or
> steal?) I do need a 10GigE-40GigE capable switch in the lab, and BOY oh
> boy oh boy would I love to test this one.
>
> Has this tech made it into their routing products?
>
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 4:19 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >     While I strongly agree with their premise:
> >
> >     "Multi-tenant DCNs cannot rely on specialized protocols and
> >     mechanisms
> >     that assume single ownership and end-system compliance. It is
> >     necessary rather to implement general, well-understood mechanisms
> >     provided as a network service that require as few assumptions
> >     about DC
> >     workload as possible."
> >
> >     ... And there's a solid set of links to current work, and a very
> >     interesting comparison to pfabric, their DCTCP emulation is too
> >     flawed
> >     to be convincing, and we really should get around to making the
> >     ns2
> >     fq_codel emulation fully match reality. This is also a scenario
> >     where
> >     I'd like to see cake tried, to demonstrate the effectiveness (or
> >     not!)
> >     of 8 way set associative queuing, cobalt, per host/per flow fq,
> >     etc,
> >     vs some of the workloads they outline.
> >
> >     https://perso.telecom-paristech.fr/drossi/paper/rossi18hpsr.pdf
> >
> >     --
> >
> >     Dave Täht
> >     CTO, TekLibre, LLC
> >     http://www.teklibre.com
> >     Tel: 1-831-205-9740
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Cake mailing list
> >     Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> >     https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bloat mailing list
> > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat



-- 

Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-205-9740

      reply	other threads:[~2018-12-15 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-06  3:18 [Cake] " Dave Taht
2018-12-13  7:58 ` dario.rossi
2018-12-13  9:51 ` Luca Muscariello
2018-12-15 17:09   ` [Cake] [Bloat] " Dave Taht
2018-12-15 17:21     ` Dave Taht [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw7qbwKdj8iDNw+Qj6=V7LvOK5sOK=d5aEVw36EWUge-Nw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=aqm@ietf.org \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave@taht.net \
    --cc=luca.muscariello@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox