From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x22d.google.com (mail-oi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D4BD21F789 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 04:16:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oiak8 with SMTP id k8so59521185oia.1 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 04:16:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+UhuDL5iSry4dgLeDkqZjWjf3gnJn1BElZgTP7D9dik=; b=kjuIsLQnO1TbqlLAQUCThXqpks5T9N7nU11SXwZk2YWYutTt8zmFmCfwZgUF1G6YMW lAnkWlkD9WhNSahxGHq2uRR+WnKTL4yy+fgHIZHgfPAx9B7CWuJwbyZ0Fp++Y7dfb7W0 egjhtTbNhF5La/DjK2Ad1QWAQZCyizGor1KLe2XfFslohdxfoISIWD6P8yftQPQHMwmU 0MMsPigSTaZ4GpttPY3Zrg2DkL8tIIjw8ebjYlsVNeH6pulODUKvFslqqAxrO/FQsPni DXBxDhlJBYZSdukWp53i8FiawqMhmJT5aNPzJ4DhQRNum5j4b5TaYQoG4l1pTMlDYB1d cD8w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.203.142 with SMTP id b136mr3286530oig.104.1444648618143; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 04:16:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.108.212 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 04:16:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20FAC204-CAA3-4E36-938A-E857EE81C0A3@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 04:16:58 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Jonathan Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, dtaht/sch_cake , dtaht/sch_cake Subject: Re: [Cake] [sch_cake] Merge branch 'exposeinterval' (5541271) X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:17:21 -0000 um, no, interval needs to be kept in usec, and converted more like I did. On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Jonathan Morton = wrote: >> >>> On 12 Oct, 2015, at 12:24, Dave Taht wrote: >>> >>> This is incorrect for the DC use case. We should be able to have the >>> target fall below at least 250us. >> >> Hey, I=E2=80=99m trying to work on this myself, but the code keeps chang= ing under me. > > Tough. Deal with it. :) Once the rtt option works right toke and I can > finally go test the > count/2 idea out properly in the testbed, like, today. You otherwise > have the pen, > as far as I am concerned. > >> >> - Jonathan Morton >> > > > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > Do you want faster, better, wifi? https://www.patreon.com/dtaht --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Do you want faster, better, wifi? https://www.patreon.com/dtaht