Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] ack filter rrul result at 1000/100
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:28:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7sxna2Ot=Q86LaTGN+2z2Y=NzdV2-EcqU6ypkc6=DbTw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7H9YsrXAqq-aAb55s715FfR35MVbt35S6mFyU+DjNWFQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 690 bytes --]

This is a much saner test result[1], showing about a 20% improvement
under the rrul_be test. I scaled back the topology to two instances of
cake on the middlebox, shaping to 100mbits on one side and 10mbits on
the other, and flipped filtering on or off. The win will improve more
with upload/download ratios of ever worse than 10/1, and the rrul is
not exactly a test of real traffic.

What other ratios are out there, particularly in the dsl world?

I can think of a few ways to get more acks to filter out, for example,
not using the "sparse flow optimization" for acks.

[1] it also turned out my test target box, an odroid c2, couldn't push
more than 500mbits bidir in the first place.

[-- Attachment #2: rrul_be-2017-11-15T201221.312953.ack_filter_100Mbit_10Mbit.flent.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 83889 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: rrul_be-2017-11-15T201510.970394.no_ack_filter_100Mbit_10Mbit.flent.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 82641 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #4: rrul_be_-_ack-filter-100mbit-10mbit.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 993708 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #5: odroid_c2_limits.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 66686 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-16  4:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-16  3:13 Dave Taht
2017-11-16  3:45 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-16  4:28   ` Dave Taht [this message]
2017-11-16 11:30     ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-16 13:55     ` Bret Towe
2017-11-16 14:29       ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-16 14:33         ` Bret Towe
2017-11-16 15:03       ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-16 16:25         ` Dave Taht
     [not found] <mailman.1021.1510806526.3609.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-11-16  9:24 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-16 12:47   ` Alan Jenkins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw7sxna2Ot=Q86LaTGN+2z2Y=NzdV2-EcqU6ypkc6=DbTw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox