From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Justin Kilpatrick <justin@althea.net>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] Advantages to tightly tuning latency
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:19:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7vDAeAfsuD_LY33rWsw2__rPb4iRdoZsejqqBQuT9syQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <189eb1a9-ea02-452b-92f3-8005f97eb612@www.fastmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 4:07 PM Justin Kilpatrick <justin@althea.net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020, at 2:44 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> > It has always been my dream, that at least for outbound, there would
> > be sufficient backpressure from the driver
> > to not have to shape at all, or monitor the link. We have that now in
> > BQL and AQL. free.fr's dsl driver "does the right thing" - no other
> > dsl driver does. Nor usb network devices. I hope more folk roll up
> > their sleeves and test the ath10k some, it's looking lovely from here.
> >
> > https://forum.openwrt.org/t/aql-and-the-ath10k-is-lovely/
> >
> > next up either the new mediatek chip or intel..
>
> I'm curious if you have any opinions about the WiFi stacks for the Marvel Armada
Marvell's wifi is currently "not horrible", but certainly overbuffered.
>and Qualcomm IPQ40xx.
I was under the impression this looked like an ath10k to the world. Am
I wrong? What products is it in these days?
>Any trees I should be barking up for better performance? We have had some complaints in higher interference areas...
>
> These devices have the best WireGuard performance per dollar for Althea's use case so we're deploying them pretty heavily.
>
> --
> Justin Kilpatrick
> justin@althea.net
--
Make Music, Not War
Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-435-0729
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-21 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-21 18:22 Justin Kilpatrick
2020-04-21 18:40 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-04-21 18:44 ` Dave Taht
2020-04-21 22:25 ` Thibaut
2020-04-21 22:33 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-04-21 22:44 ` Dave Taht
2020-04-21 22:50 ` Dave Taht
2020-04-21 23:07 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-04-21 23:27 ` Dave Taht
2020-04-22 8:28 ` Thibaut
2020-04-22 9:03 ` Luca Muscariello
2020-04-22 14:48 ` Dave Taht
2020-04-22 15:28 ` Luca Muscariello
2020-04-22 17:42 ` David P. Reed
2020-04-23 9:29 ` Maxime Bizon
2020-04-23 11:57 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-04-23 12:29 ` Luca Muscariello
2020-04-23 12:33 ` Maxime Bizon
2020-04-23 16:42 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-04-23 17:31 ` Maxime Bizon
2020-04-23 18:30 ` Sebastian Moeller
2020-04-23 21:53 ` Maxime Bizon
2020-04-23 18:35 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-04-23 21:59 ` Maxime Bizon
2020-04-23 23:05 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-04-23 23:11 ` Dave Taht
2020-04-23 16:28 ` Dave Taht
2020-04-21 23:06 ` Justin Kilpatrick
2020-04-21 23:19 ` Dave Taht [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw7vDAeAfsuD_LY33rWsw2__rPb4iRdoZsejqqBQuT9syQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=justin@althea.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox