From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B7263BA8E for ; Wed, 30 May 2018 16:46:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id a195-v6so12964817qkg.3 for ; Wed, 30 May 2018 13:46:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fpwzhz8SLfjsqxb+YxgEgxKwaoyDXEZpQocJfNpjZ+c=; b=GhpOhTaBacZIVRQsboa3vQZ6L8lYYQ/RbbMPUbrv9ZuFXCA7mfykUabRrhAxTTJq7u 4SalMuxgx5v8OKb3pC0dq9XEhD9qVpaf7FMGN+jGp+42lSzDKPvOP41DwQuiP0kpZiJX Ex2tTAQNu1kEbF64hovjhy6i8qDvtIBs2UYn7hyPgSUE8zQ7WzB9ddQhmva/49wn3t0w XdYOeB5UfayWTZAUyc0hh4YObksP7VjAUHrgDTzBy2lFmQm694vxCj+GFb5QWixORBV+ aOzT5kfmesiPDGI/gPEbdykrHG4gRbnZZF/v2fljoAXoMi2b1umaORLvQi9DxShtHZvf 8yeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fpwzhz8SLfjsqxb+YxgEgxKwaoyDXEZpQocJfNpjZ+c=; b=L8yEGPN1VD49xalUalP+svJRSIIA6ALS7T0P8zTP++R7xHfrjyHitJ/cCnmIGyXw43 iOikSKSfyHP3tKo+WGx8cYfPOKNcjlAolfG8gX7doPNGaRfYBgxMyY0owrXqzTSFIdif NVPltLUPi/RwgvS3BUCxdIeWp0PMupgNho7u4z/lO+dx+G61POt6XK58c+mHnxeYOmnx 47BhX0eHkAZasnvAyt9EI8l19/lELWvg27ggaUXO6IQzirDp2YjAS51ol7f3VT5xYdEj kQJDdC1Ku1F/Cgi0JuRdCdufBuF+ywqCJFiw3MAmeDFHWgibkF7DU7IO1GYWsVuTHULn CD4w== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3Hultz9RxDUqRnQmumrG240nnAb/nEZwG3Gxd0mgZ6LVGJRKyh 1EyRTTWAgn5pwK2NLlK9QZGDxRHeT4q5/OllzV0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKI89pjFC8BvmECOIhj2szo/1fp+IqnsS+2HWv9yN/gftDOPMnOkQRKB3NMtxP7bgO0wF+4alhPKV6AK2GR7oDc= X-Received: by 2002:a37:ef0d:: with SMTP id j13-v6mr3870781qkk.263.1527713176121; Wed, 30 May 2018 13:46:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ac8:7193:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 30 May 2018 13:46:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <87muwyy34k.fsf@toke.dk> <87tvqoc3vl.fsf@toke.dk> <87r2lsc2dm.fsf@toke.dk> From: Dave Taht Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 13:46:15 -0700 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: Georgios Amanakis , Cake List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Cake] Fwd: Does the latest cake support "tc filter"? X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 20:46:16 -0000 I also worry that the new tc filter related code is going to cause weirdness from other subsystems and deployments. Someone (for example) sets iptables priorities or something else for some other reason to make a set of iptables rules work (the skb-priority field is so massively overloaded), and that messes up what cake wants. this is why I elided tc filters entirely all those years ago. I guess the MAJ approach toke took is sufficient.