From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 970D43BA8E for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 11:43:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id w13-v6so6458962ywa.5 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 08:43:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=targointernet-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Qd2syOScKzN9IBnAtCiio9qQpOikK2aujWZ+dI98Lnc=; b=W1WYvJnB2rQ4pcMfr5CSrO1ixP36dyLvkRVOUFuyAzxM3YrVdlegXxmhtAUZCS1FuW AM43hwq+WXYyh11Ndq4/AwtN0S32V5I4l5TQnGEk11SHcmWQ4qGIQMR1jj415nhFAA6t YPipgEY8rXEZv1rkTZm7z7QdtRGFAisyyVmqHip5WMj0nPxNGgT/L7t/T2jz3VQ/nPW6 8Xo67KCwwxnlQH6VDyJnfQAKw6WK9g6c3UQi9C5jRb/sixnaCqtiY6PcwTzXs7U4pnJ2 ECE2DqBJEOXQSlqD2u4XiO2Mn8xs/bTLkwihGXLvyGbF7HiIXy+ms3UJ6XEeUEeaVSKW qeig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Qd2syOScKzN9IBnAtCiio9qQpOikK2aujWZ+dI98Lnc=; b=gev/2Ttuu4yY72mdwTLPoLnfOYoaY2ql7lnogl83oNUWUX0jXLpqfPxG3y6cTVWgKh J87IzSXVI9I7Nz/MpdPqybADBtq0Os29N800Tau9twcDEu5aqR5h7YUnsv+9Ba4Bh00Y tiRMvdw4ndb8HO/aWOz2WrdyFyGtz+uCXBHQCfONMbU1OwHt7ZKgpVoDh62gtd5erqJf xOE+xhep89yksw+rpiKn6rFHBDupiL/1/HC4Ghugjf8ElsbfRJ1J0fIGVmWbYBAGtD99 NBgNYaDnRmxdVqdXe1QxoRze2Z1O3uwQBR8a72Usc8ARpFR4KnQfgC0JonC6Nm1LVlR/ 2lIw== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2kEY1QQSYRxMhBoCprtnaIY566v+m98rvLt0hlCFhrAtju0mDv 05EO83GRiNpg6klJC/1J+ERJYVjat3R7sHEqWv47Jw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLQLu/1QBL4nQHJIk7A4dYoN25+8Gr5ZHZ//bUOlaM7gdT/0uLdCUA+SZN/W/VmpUfgd8paJYbEJ8YQ5uVTQc4= X-Received: by 2002:a0d:d207:: with SMTP id u7-v6mr9903830ywd.271.1528731824897; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 08:43:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a81:7107:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 08:43:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [96.125.192.254] From: Michel Blais Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 11:43:44 -0400 Message-ID: To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006154d0056e5f9dec" Subject: [Cake] Bandwidith rate by host instead of global while using [dual-]srchost and [dual-]dsthost X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 15:43:45 -0000 --0000000000006154d0056e5f9dec Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi all, Is it possible while using srchost, or dual-srchost, and dsthost, or dual-dsthost, to do a bandwidth limitation by host instead of global ? From what I read, seem like not. I saw several times on messages on mailling list that some option could be usefull for ISP and dual-srchost and dual-dsthost would seem something usefull for small ISP, an alternative to Mikrotik PCQ with all the advantage of cake like flow fairness and latency. Thanks --- Cordialement, / With regards, Michel Blais --0000000000006154d0056e5f9dec Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,

Is it possible while u= sing srchost, or dual-srchost, and dsthost, or dual-dsthost, to do a bandwi= dth limitation by host instead of global ? From what I read, seem like not.=

I saw several times on messages on mailling list that some op= tion could be usefull for ISP and dual-srchost and dual-dsthost would seem = something usefull for small ISP, an alternative to Mikrotik PCQ with all th= e advantage of cake like flow fairness and latency.

Thanks
<= div>
---
Cordialement,=C2=A0 /=C2=A0 With rega= rds,

Michel Blais
=
--0000000000006154d0056e5f9dec--