From: Avakash bhat <avakash261@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
"Vybhav Pai" <vybhavpai1999.vp@gmail.com>,
"Shrinidhi Varna" <shrinidhivarna.171co145@nitk.edu.in>,
"Mohit P. Tahiliani" <tahiliani@nitk.edu.in>,
"Deepak K" <deepakkavoor99@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Cake] Query on ACK
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 12:06:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC8NkTBRWrhAQneAf6ZacTzWLYyM5TqX6jmD4-fafAD=7iPgfQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A85845BB-010A-4F39-99F4-C6206F7FEA65@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 962 bytes --]
Ok thanks so much for the clarifications.
That cleared it up quite a bit.
Thanks,
Avakash Bhat
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 12:37 PM Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
> I think that you will remove all redundant Backs in one go considerably
> advancing the new ACK in the queue. And more importantly, in most relevant
> modes cake will apply one queue per flow stochastically, so almost all
> packet's in a reverse ACK flow will be ACK with identical 5-tupel....
>
> On 7 May 2020 08:44:59 CEST, Avakash bhat <avakash261@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the quick response. I also had a followup question.
>>
>> If the ack filter adds the new ack to the tail of the queue after
>> removing an ack from the queue, won't it be starving the ack?
>> The replaced ack was much ahead in the queue than the ack we replaced at
>> the tail right?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Avakash Bhat
>>
>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1622 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-08 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-06 18:43 Avakash bhat
2020-05-06 19:01 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-05-06 19:13 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-05-07 6:44 ` Avakash bhat
2020-05-07 6:59 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-05-07 7:07 ` Sebastian Moeller
2020-05-08 6:36 ` Avakash bhat [this message]
2020-05-08 6:50 ` Dave Taht
2020-05-08 7:41 ` Sebastian Moeller
2020-05-08 15:08 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-05-08 15:11 ` Dave Taht
2020-05-08 15:20 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-05-08 15:40 ` Dave Taht
2020-05-25 5:17 ` Avakash bhat
2020-05-25 9:42 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-05-25 11:58 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-06-14 12:43 ` Avakash bhat
2020-06-14 14:43 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-06-16 5:22 ` Avakash bhat
2020-06-16 5:31 ` Dave Taht
2020-06-16 5:32 ` Dave Taht
2020-05-08 17:43 ` [Cake] Curious regarding Cake sensitivity to hardware queue depth David P. Reed
2020-05-08 8:23 ` [Cake] Query on ACK Sebastian Moeller
2020-05-06 19:08 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAC8NkTBRWrhAQneAf6ZacTzWLYyM5TqX6jmD4-fafAD=7iPgfQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=avakash261@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=deepakkavoor99@gmail.com \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=shrinidhivarna.171co145@nitk.edu.in \
--cc=tahiliani@nitk.edu.in \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=vybhavpai1999.vp@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox