Ok thanks so much for the clarifications. That cleared it up quite a bit. Thanks, Avakash Bhat On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 12:37 PM Sebastian Moeller wrote: > I think that you will remove all redundant Backs in one go considerably > advancing the new ACK in the queue. And more importantly, in most relevant > modes cake will apply one queue per flow stochastically, so almost all > packet's in a reverse ACK flow will be ACK with identical 5-tupel.... > > On 7 May 2020 08:44:59 CEST, Avakash bhat wrote: >> >> >> Thanks for the quick response. I also had a followup question. >> >> If the ack filter adds the new ack to the tail of the queue after >> removing an ack from the queue, won't it be starving the ack? >> The replaced ack was much ahead in the queue than the ack we replaced at >> the tail right? >> >> Thanks, >> Avakash Bhat >> > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >