From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com (mail-qt0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3734B3B2A4 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:58:59 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id e2so10744811qti.0 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:58:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wEBcY/ykSgUbf0EhOVyjxg9/piQRVRd4WJSNHI0CmV8=; b=Gx8uv4prCBT8ruq0G5F4Nt7q130qjeyK3HMa+xxRTWdZwzAVWbN0QQhuTcfFzkQrK4 PG7leAe+Be6PN8QdAinlTKs2kMJrPM4SVdPWiqgqnv9ZlrSX+Rrf2GC96S5V3plvI9z4 A80A5U/QfKNAFceaW39bqAtdgtqwFjAcMNA0CB931aDKMVLlTTrIlBoYI0dzqho8z/2u Jvx3Ymna+LhFxbQdlOJvgQfRErzdINBivwqW4OQ+Rx28BO/EQEA9O5MemsJgUFyRsF1i wbIszMSEv4H4gpBg2deyozpBT5EcPco0jyi1VJnBkP0/+dDiDymTGmSUXo9W0Ok31WaE IZhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wEBcY/ykSgUbf0EhOVyjxg9/piQRVRd4WJSNHI0CmV8=; b=YQD3gkNWqBQF8E7frxlkWhJ8PG3Wb8Qi75YAP8p2RGQY3e2F4JRCBKxQZeU/UDzQhC wWDtOTJr4hKpGpGGModN0y/yg10w6f2cOYz8LHh+khmwu5zm0s9BzikoXMaWui6IC0g0 uptHpawU284x2NML/A8m8ocrzAJYLQGek50ZPpuy4yU89HgQufV2cZrD93UJAVOyw24A FB1K3N1FyNUD1J4Tsj2eCurWRZoadiyLarOqpY/5LuIjV3Ym9eLKIKZKTjUIPuOJUeHW lTd+F+PHuS164BlBZ1/ion7wKM/1Yh4LWTz4S2epS8G61SVworWu1rjDBgCWF+IGmC31 /06w== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJAVmmnZYDZw7pk2Iz/FP+ZYG1PgjNlU94b7TtSLcdqglKUv3g4 rnohT5+Z95hPGhAhyGYQ6WjgFbRyAUUWewLQjIE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZ2Ad9V64PyVajb0szddzVH0U8of6wFgHZI+1CvmoZ/EzGW7/2bgFPBtFFaCxsuj3GVorDRYocPu6UJmrLSSWo= X-Received: by 10.200.52.232 with SMTP id x37mr5858844qtb.287.1512079138611; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:58:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.95.69 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:58:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.95.69 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:58:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87609r4fch.fsf@toke.dk> References: <98B33089-BA99-40C2-8C25-B4568505AAC6@gmail.com> <87h8tb4gy9.fsf@toke.dk> <87609r4fch.fsf@toke.dk> From: Georgios Amanakis Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:58:58 -0500 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: Cake List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114049eeede53e055f3a5bc0" Subject: Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 3 X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 21:58:59 -0000 --001a114049eeede53e055f3a5bc0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't really know. When I ran "ping 10.10.0.1" it just worked. fping -p250 didn't. On Nov 30, 2017 4:38 PM, "Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen" = wrote: > Georgios Amanakis writes: > > > To correct myself, fping did not die prematurely, it was getting no > > responses from the remote host because its p parameter was too short at > > default for an RTT of 600ms. After looking at the source, I realized th= at > > it is affected but the s parameter of flent, and changed that instead. > > Ah, gotcha. That makes sense. So fping will ignore replies that arrive > after it sent the next packet? That's kinda odd... Does regular ping > behave the same way? > > -Toke > --001a114049eeede53e055f3a5bc0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I don't really know. When I ran "ping 10.10.0.1&= quot; it just worked. fping -p250 didn't.

On Nov 30, 2017 4:38 PM, "Toke H=C3= =B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen" <toke@toke= .dk> wrote:
G= eorgios Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail= .com> writes:

> To correct myself, fping did not die prematurely, it was getting no > responses from the remote host because its p parameter was too short a= t
> default for an RTT of 600ms. After looking at the source, I realized t= hat
> it is affected but the s parameter of flent, and changed that instead.=

Ah, gotcha. That makes sense. So fping will ignore replies that arrive
after it sent the next packet? That's kinda odd... Does regular ping behave the same way?

-Toke
--001a114049eeede53e055f3a5bc0--