From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ACC33B29E for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 09:41:11 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id q128so20564125ljb.11 for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 06:41:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S26+1Hddu2tKscKitv/Kow2JOLL53BhGHQ2knUtRmW0=; b=Zdo5ltB1ZsxPpNS5kZInVv+doHiQh5k5kS7XmdB90XseOWgCszMzsBwfKCTpFmOgdw oLdvAQYzN9TMKVMNeN8p76Njm5uK8JdrEN2ByQQtGa7gTkHU1FZu3i4esKSoedAH6V5p 0QtBeuU9vgkBoii/00U7VcY/C0PkyHe5SA6EZRjff23HEqgk7nRtE0B62Y4ZpmNMiVW2 KVerxltdkBEOTS4CRuuYAbdRhgJn3YmC+KafnfI5EPe0JEXftdYeHZK9KeE/Bt0ruQhI 48TGndkslQL7R7qSy/VgKZ+csVaLBE3HIotSlrIs+9hYStdYZyihgofGEtONeXJdV3Cq jDnA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S26+1Hddu2tKscKitv/Kow2JOLL53BhGHQ2knUtRmW0=; b=Qq1Ck+Yd2vofCn4aj14wEhhElFLHDMuYkqnYUKjOyYVl7huSNm+0m49OEP5aZ8rN74 8/X7AFA3rvXpBmPyJxCtFOlJzL9t//vwG+muwNUYBdkvO/4vm8gtF9TMsbWHgZuHqIwT n7KugEig2S8dxML1JTvs2SpI1rtxYyIeI21+KbfBCZwHsMfU3zD33hd/LKgN/8RrD/wR yQOBpGXWOfMucJS5ssnSFJfRPreDLdsDZbo3cUZZk+iGkMlaburugrpF2Aw5B8xlHaal DklWfPVf51r2meUcbUXAbVou2zSYCmDUoTv3N6QdPkp2PkjptnspxaDzqjOh58vJKd54 ar6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUePT1007EOrDb6JtmtHFn1BBxGZfy5MvhvRlP1x+5HnW+NMvZG 5DyIPF9EIXWRecDezj3XMttrk4f4JzP6hIvUB70= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx6pHAT2SZgOBXKREzUyCn+XlmUowhliebJFH26yc0jmZ6yq9PkErUvr8wxK/Aa8gT1+knEA4rfYVNCTWuqvhI= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9dda:: with SMTP id x26mr2887899ljj.53.1551451270255; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 06:41:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <72193310-7502-47B8-9554-7F8F9FA23204@heistp.net> <874l8mn9iy.fsf@toke.dk> In-Reply-To: From: Georgios Amanakis Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 09:40:58 -0500 Message-ID: To: Pete Heist Cc: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= , Cake List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] Upstream submission of dual-mode fairness patch X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2019 14:41:11 -0000 Thanks for testing Pete! The unfairness you see occurs if you shape ingress using ifb on the same interface you shape egress, right? Sounds puzzling to me, and I don't have an explanation right now. On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:55 AM Pete Heist wrote: > > > On Mar 1, 2019, at 12:01 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > > Pete Heist writes: > > That said, unless there=E2=80=99s an obvious reason for this that=E2=80= =99s fixable, > I=E2=80=99m fine with how it is, considering the improvement. :) > > > Cool! And you haven't seen any regressions in other usage? :) > > > To be honest, today=E2=80=99s the first time I tried it and I haven=E2=80= =99t done any testing on it beyond fairness. (So, ship it!) > > At least, I haven=E2=80=99t seen any other problems in this one-armed rou= ting scenario or a regular host to host scenario. > > Host fairness seems =E2=80=9Cmostly good" no matter what values I choose = for the number of flows of the four clients, flow fairness still looks good= , and I don=E2=80=99t see any problems starting and stopping different numb= ers of flows mid-test. > > Pete > > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake