From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56A223BA8E for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 06:19:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id l26-v6so2487074lfc.8 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 03:19:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gCMJ/VL9RJO6Al/0CaspMUoQAZOanugN/mbyJP0YK20=; b=UafXuATOGArjOMO44MjQBBlheMAfHpjnSebvBpJk8aaXrX/vqmzA9uXacOpiyqUK+q zE7nS6aP1KvqUy2Z7bdSnnF4kc1CvQhcswVxnrVVQzKnPXXRDKF/EuWu+cx2G7vjKKIj y5/YWMXa1SvRJfrITRF+KIJvsQqLGLhSTJ82Sjv2rJ75FnxwTo8rUud7VVV1+g0rk9sn rriC6UalgwvqZvrjhc4jwGJNv7Op0jCX4HKOalTouxRWo23JQGQO9PSoxX8oM7+ALviS QNCV/qmaa4o7ihYKHUeaIn3qB35ObiQ6P1bpHcBLILXhDh0dJ6f1f+FK3lijuE/oY0g6 ITUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gCMJ/VL9RJO6Al/0CaspMUoQAZOanugN/mbyJP0YK20=; b=kU3iLUy4raW7FK2h1R2wuPjSnR8ZkcWxft4ZF191t++43Jt4qOOAa9zZbhVX2TZ2JQ Q8wHt0v+opH5dwpdGayxJ00BP6LuzOTP2/Bis98+JUJEi1/OzKgY2ab0JyH+4Z+HT5sT KkOWNheB3cywSoQICc4m5SntzwIYM2LcnYYaA/0AHJ9Vf1nRnrzLYYyb6mpL4V0+QI6a FsKFX0V7gmp9SlLYQgYr9hgiinlOdaD7Ex793Z3DtMWiBXfBFANECXPBdgpftRnuDjgG tHAUvx0mxLnjFkSbhqyADqz2IbcCzuWQ8WfTprElDyRyUz8o3RjZT8rPF3ZqPYZmqzPH AOyg== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51Bfsbl6wDhWbOgHq4NryTUuK7joKxalLbEpWY3Kg8ZtIYVEuCg4 CI8UlFkGTP1Zgpx1qNWX3EKMCUuyErYbR7g+0QH15A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZVvsXnya0FJrWJWOJKlynCLW6Lwy+tfC0MCnnJPhohtBsALbHUhTVdYy8Td5QTPhwOWnq1bqqd19VgfgKigO8= X-Received: by 2002:a19:2a51:: with SMTP id f78-v6mr20623844lfl.97.1536056396987; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 03:19:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Georgios Amanakis Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 13:19:45 +0300 Message-ID: To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e5c1b8057508ffaa" Subject: [Cake] Cake on elements of a bridge X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 10:19:58 -0000 --000000000000e5c1b8057508ffaa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Dear All, I was giving a transparent firewall a try, and wondered whether cake can be applied on the interfaces of a bridge. I want to put an extra router in-line between clients and the ISP-modem-router. It will have two interfaces (eth0 facing wan, eth1 facing lan), bridged together as br0. Can I fearlessly apply cake on eth0 and eth1? Would this be compatible with features like ingress, ack-filter or even nat? Georgios --000000000000e5c1b8057508ffaa Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear All,

I = was giving a transparent firewall a try, and wondered whether cake can be a= pplied on the interfaces of a bridge. I want to put an extra router in-line= between clients and the ISP-modem-router. It will have two interfaces (eth= 0 facing wan, eth1 facing lan), bridged together as br0.=C2=A0

Can I fearlessly apply cake on eth0 = and eth1? Would this be compatible with features like ingress, ack-filter o= r even nat?

Georgios
--000000000000e5c1b8057508ffaa--